Who's The Judge Who Prevented John St. Clair Akwei's Lawsuit From Being Heard In A U.S. Federal Courtroom? Did The NSA Intimidate This Judge?
"People ask 'em the difference between a Democrat and Republican in Congress - like they don't get it: HERE'S HOW YOU GET IT: It's organized crime. It's just that the Democrats are the Gambinos, and the Republicans are the Genoveses. The people at the top, they act like it's a crap game. Like it's their crap game and their making lots of money. Every once in awhile, somebody at the table shoots each other, but the moment ANYTHING comes in to disrupt their crap game - they all unite to protect it..."
"An event has happened, upon which it is difficult to speak, and impossible to be silent."
As the contents of John St. Clair Akwei's lawsuit against the National Security Agency continue to circulate over the Internet, citizens from around this planet must be asking themselves why a U.S. Judge would have kept such an important lawsuit (and one which implicates the NSA is the most egregious domestic spying ever documented) from ever being heard?
One must also wonder exactly who this Judge is? And why did this government official refuse to allow John St. Clair Akwei to try his case against the National Security Agency? Especially when this lawsuit, given its abject importance to the freedom of the American people under the U.S. Bill of Rights 4TH Amendment, should be heard before the U.S. Federal Supreme Court.
Was this Judge intimidated by the Intelligence community into sidelining Akwei VS NSA, because John Akwei is exposing a classified electronic warfare program which the NSA is using in which to covertly spy upon, torture and even murder American citizens? This while using other Americans for the express purpose of non consensual human experimentation.
With all due respect, your honor, and in the interest of protecting humanity itself, this author implores you to speak out in regard to why you refused to hear Akwei VS NSA in your courtroom.
<< Home