Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Webster Tarpley's 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism -- Were The Aircraft Used In The Attacks On 9-11 Equipped With A Global Hawk Satellite Tracking System?

"It definitely didn't look like a commercial plane. I didn't see any windows on the side. Again, it was not a normal flight that I've ever seen at an airport. It had a blue logo on the front , and it did not look like it belonged in the area."

-- FOX News Reporter, Mark Burnback regarding the real plane that hit the second Tower of the World Trade Center, not the fictional Flight 175 of the 9-11 Commission's Report.

The FBI's 9-11 Disinformation/Obstruction Of Justice

There are so many disinformation artists on the Internet in regard to 9-11, many of whom claim to be "insiders" who are in fact deliberately attempting to confuse the truth behind this inside government job.

However, there is no longer any question that 9-11 was perpetrated by an oligarchy within the U.S. Military Industrial complex that together with the Project For A New American Century, used the Bush puppet Administration to cover up. This as well as propagate the present war on terror hoax which the FBI has been aiding and abetting since shortly after 9-11-2001.

As such, there are few alternative researchers who have the background to understand the logistics of such a false flag operation, and who can truthfully explain to the civilian population why and how such operations were implemented.

Author Webster Tarpley is such a researcher; an expert on the U.S. Intelligence community, and one of the few insiders who's accurately reported on the inside job that 9-11 was; as well as the FBI's complicity in covering up virtually every aspect of the truth from the public; including seizing (and likely destroying) evidence from the Pentagon and World Trade Center.

Amongst his myriad observations, Mr. Tarpley has made a very sound case for the Pentagon's having been struck by a cruise missile; citing the basic characteristics of a cruise missile on route to its target, including the missile's turning abruptly at a severe angle, just before quickly accelerating into its target. Exactly what the object which struck the Pentagon did on 9-11-2001.

There is also the fact that these cruise missiles have friend or foe capabilities which enable them to travel through parts of their own countries while on route to an enemy target without being shot down. Tarpley believes that it is this function of the missile which he claims likely struck the Pentagon on 9-11-2001, that enabled the missile to evade detection as a foe, and enter the heavily protected airspace around the Pentagon.

It is also clear given the sophistication of this technology, that if in fact it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, its guidance system could have just as easily been used to hit the Capital Building or the White House. However, it wasn't used to damage these buildings, and instead only the reinforced portion of the Pentagon.

Whoever launched this cruise missile did not want to destroy Washington D.C. (because they are undoubtedly part of this bureaucracy), but to instead get close enough to the epicenter of this government, to make such an attack by government insiders seem plausibly deniable.

If these mercenaries wanted to truly destroy Washington D.C. , the Capital and White House would have been decimated along with several other key structures -- yet, they were left untouched. Just further proof that 9-11 was an inside job used as the catalyst in which to foment two wars which could not have been propagated without such a brazen attack. And to pass the Patriot Act, so that the inherent protections under the U.S Bill of Rights could be completely nullified, under the pretext of the war on terror mega lie.

Tarpley also states that these missiles have a reinforced front section referred to as the "jet" which enables them to penetrate several layers of steel reinforced concrete, as the one which hit the Pentagon apparently did on 9-11. Another important point here is that such missiles have tail sections like the one which the viewer can barely make out in the few heavily edited frames that the FBI begrudgingly released to the public several years ago. The tail section on this object is much lower than that of a 757, which would have been nearly as high as the area measured from the ground to the roof of the Pentagon.

Moreover, the object as Mr. Tarpley notes, is in fact white. The color of an American Airlines 757 is silver.

The testimony of a Pentagon worker by the name of April Gallop offers even more proof that the Pentagon was struck by a missile:

"I was buried in rubble and my first thought was for my son. I crawled around until I found his stroller. It was all crumpled up into a ball and I was very afraid. But then I heard his voice and I managed to locate him. We crawled out through a hole in the side of the building. Outside they were treating survivors on the grassy lawn. But all the ambulances had left, so a man who was near the scene stepped up, put us in his private car, and drove us to the hospital. The images are burned into my brain."

"They (the men who visited Gallop while she was recovering in the hospital -- more than likely FBI agents) never identified themselves or even said which agency they worked for. But I know they were not newsmen because I learned that the Pentagon told newsreporters not to cover survivors' stories or they would not get any more stories out of there. The men who visited all said they couldn't tell me what to say, they only wanted to make suggestions. But then they told me what to do, which was to take the (victims compensation fund) money and shut up.

They also kept insisting that a plane hit the building. They repeated this over and over. But I was there and I never saw a plane or even debris from a plane. I figure the plane story is there to brainwash people."

-- From the book 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism

There is no way that a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9-11-2001, and the U.S. Congress, the former Bush Administration, the FBI and the rest of the U.S. Intel community know it. They have all blatantly lied to the American people, as have the U.S. Media.

In regard to the most mysterious flight of them all, Flight 93, Tarpley also states that the official explanation for this plane being forced down by its passengers doesn't fit the forensics regarding the remnants of this craft.

His belief is that Flight 93 was shot down by an aircraft from either the U.S. Air Force or the shadow government which initiated these attacks. The eyewitness accounts of Flight 93 include people who saw at least one white aircraft circling Flight 93 before they heard an explosion. One of these witnesses, a woman by the name of Susan McElwain also had the following to say in regard to Flight 93:

"It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50 ft. above my mini-van. It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was traveling real fast, but hardly made any sound. Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialed 911 and told them what happened. I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realized it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93. I didn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane.

The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down. There's no way I imagined this plane -- it was definitely military, it just had that look. It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the Internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around. Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3000 feet up. But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40 feet above my head. They did not want my story -- nobody here did." (London Daily Mirror, 2002)

"Ms. McElwain, a special education teacher, refused to accept the official version of what she saw, in part because of a conversation she had several hours after the fact with the wife of a friend of the family who is in the Air Force. According to McElwain, that friend said her husband had called her that morning and said 'I can't talk, but we've just shot a plane down.'

'I presumed they meant Flight 93. I have no doubt those brave people on board tried to do something, but I don't believe what happened on the plane brought it down. If they shot it down, or something else happened, everyone, especially the victims' families have a right to know.'" (London Daily Mirror, 2002)

There's also the alleged and now famous phone call from Todd Beamer to an employee of the GTE Airfone Customer Care Center in Oakbrook, Illinois, Lisa Jefferson. A call which Tarpley questions the veracity of, since Beamer was never actually able to speak directly with his wife, who was told of the events on Flight 93 ,which were alleged to have unfolded shortly before it crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

The story as told by Lisa Jefferson, that the occupants of this plane were about to storm the cabin and crash the plane instead of allowing it to be flown into Washington, D.C.

It is entirely possible that the alleged call from Beamer may have in fact never taken place at all, making the statement by Lisa Jefferson all the more dubious. However, if such a call took place, it's doubtful that the real Todd Beamer made the call; especially when one takes into consideration the fact that at the time, no technology was in place to effectively allow such calls to be made from 32,000 feet in the air (roughly the height at which Flight 93 was said to be traveling at the time it was shot down). It is also quite possible that voice morphing technology could have been used in which to duplicate the exact resonance of Todd Beamer's voice and then replicate it for the purpose of propagating disinformation in regard to the real fate of Flight 93 and its passengers.

If this in indeed the case, then this alleged phone call by Beamer could have also been used to serve as a diversionary tactic, removing any suspicion that Flight 93 may have been shot down by a missile.

There is also the fact that wreckage from Flight 93 was strewn over roughly eight miles before what was left of the airliner eventually crashed and disintegrated; indicative of Flight 93 being shot down, rather than deliberately crashed into the ground by its passengers.

One will recall that when TWA Flight 800 was accidentally shot down by the U.S. Navy off the coast of Long Island in 1996 (another incident which the FBI completely whitewashed through its own fabrications), that the wreckage was strewn over several miles of Long Island coastline.

From 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism:

"Rumsfeld, the FBI, and NORAD soon united on a common line: United 93 had not been shot down. The Bush administration was transparently eager to avoid the opprobrium of having shot down a commercial airliner carrying American citizens; this would have exposed the regime as impotent to defend the lives of its own citizens, but able to kill some of those citizens to protect top oligarchs in the White House and other Washington buildings. This would have led to an outcry from the victims' families far beyond anything that was in fact observed. "

Tarpley also notes that in all likelihood there may have been a special satellite tracking system aboard Flight 93 (Global Hawk) which could have automatically taken control of the plane in order to fly it remotely (quite possibly the same system that was used to fly planes into the World Trade Center Towers) in the event that the airliner was hijacked. And this technical aspect of Flight 93 may have been yet another reason for shooting the plane down.

Had the plane survived the crash and investigators found that it was equipped with a Global Hawk satellite tracking system, this would have also served to bolster the theory that the two planes flown into the World Trade Center Towers contained no passengers, and were in fact flown by way of remote means.

It is also entirely possible that there never were any hijackers on Flight 93.

Tarpley also notes that given that the largest piece of human remains found within miles of the crash site, was an eight inch piece of a passenger's spine, this gives more credibility to the theory that Flight 93 was in reality shot out of the sky by a missile or some type of directed energy weapon.

It is reassuring to find that Webster Tarpley, given his credibility as an author, has not only acknowledged that directed energy weaponry exists, but that it may have also been used during the attacks on 9-11. Specifically, he cites the way in which the steel beams which made up the super structure of the Towers were literally cut up into pieces during their collapse as well as melted.

The FBI has in fact gone to great lengths in which to seize and conceal evidence in every venue on 9-11, which could have led to the real perpetrators of the attacks within our own government. It is also clear that the hierarchy within the FBI knows who these perpetrators are, and is protecting them. The Bureau has intimidated legitimate witnesses into remaining silent, and taken every precaution to ensure that those within the shadow government in this country who perpetrated the attacks on 9-11 are never apprehended.

This has always been the FBI's function -- to protect the Illuminati elite within the United States while destroying evidence which could result in their prosecution. Further proof that the FBI is nothing more than a pawn of the wealthy Illuminati criminals in the United States, and which these elitest scoundrels use to attack their enemies, which is why the FBI relies heavily on its entrapment schemes and other coercive and illegal tactics. If people are not committing crimes, there is no need to entrap them, or to coerce others into doing so. Yet, this is how the FBI has operated under its guise as law enforcement for more than a Century.

Moreover, to think that the FBI would ever attempt to justify the warrantless spying of American citizens for literally hundreds of thousands of hours, while setting precedents in violating the Bill of Rights never before seen in the United States, is just a further indication of why the FBI is both inherently criminal and dangerous to the American middle class, and must be abolished at any and all costs.

Webster Tarpley has not only accurately identified these disturbing aspects of the FBI, but also done a superb job of identifying aspects of the attacks on 9-11-2001 which the FBI has deliberately attempted to conceal from the public. And given that the media system in this country has very comfortably adapted to the official lie, Tarpley's Ebook is one of the few places where an American citizen who still questions the veracity of the 9-11 Commission Report can learn the truth.

Tarpley has also proven through his research that although there are many alleged government whistle blowers in this country, only a scarce few are legitimate. And he is definitely in the latter category here, unafraid to document information which many other so called whistle blowers know about, but don't have the courage or character to reveal to the public.

9-11 Synthetic Terrorism can be read in its entirety at this Website:

untitled.bmp (image)


Wikio - Top Blogs

"The Mother Of All Black Ops" Earns A Wikio's Top Blog Rating

Julian Assange's WikiLeaks Alternative Media's Been Wrongfully Bankrupted By The U.S. Military Intelligence Complex

Rating for

Website Of The Late Investigative Journalist Sherman Skolnick