Friday, January 30, 2009

EIR Investigative Journalist Mark Burdman -- Was His Death By Suicide Or A Murder Made To Appear As A Suicide?

"I have been noticing , as you have, the growing opposition , in Britain, in the United States, to this Iraq war. Last night, something occurred to me that I think is very relevant. I think the crowd that wants this Iraq war may well do something drastic in the coming days to regain the momentum. Some very big terrorism, perhaps. It is all very well that there are these challenges to the Iraq war. But we should not lose sight of the fact that there are powerful people in Washington, who pulled off this September 11 last year. They have their Plan A, which is now in trouble. But they also have their Plan B, Plan C, Plan D. They may well have been thinking until very recently that their coup that began on September 11 was going very well. But suddenly, they have to re-think. And I think they are desperate, and capable of a lot. (EIR, August 23, 2002)

- Journalist Mark Burdman (Executive Intelligence Review)

Reporting on comments made by an "influential British political figure" regarding his belief that 9-11 was perpetrated by a rogue network within the U.S. Military Intelligence complex.

Roughly two years after printing the aforesaid comment in an article he'd written for Executive Intelligence Review Mark Burdman was dead, the victim of an apparent suicide. However, one must also wonder given Burdman's expose in the following article on Dick Cheney and the Project For A New American Century, if his death may not have actually been a murder made to appear as a suicide.

There are very powerful and dark forces within the U.S. Federal Government that have the capability of murdering anyone, and through their coercive tactics seeing to it that the truth in regard to such murders remains hidden. Such coercion has been the cornerstone of the U.S. Congress and Medias' propagation of the official and completely fabricated version of the attacks on 9-11, as well as the black propaganda campaign known as the war on terror, which has been used to destroy the U.S. Bill of Rights and American freedom.

Hitler once stated that the more often you tell a lie, the more people will believe it. No organization has been more definitive proof of this than the FBI, whose manipulation of the public through its control over the mainstream media continues to be problematic in its treasonous deception of the American people. And in spite of such machinations, the fact remains, that the FBI's complete disregard for the protected rights of all American citizens, and abject demonization of those whom the FBI conducts COINTELPRO operations against, will eventually lead to its dissolution.

If the FBI is operating illegally and attempting to justify its illegal operations (as the FBI always does), this in and of itself becomes even further reason for the Bureau to be abolished. The FBI's demonization campaign against this author is so replete with deception and precedent setting violations of both the rights of my family and self, that the Bureau is now in uncharted waters, having conned the public into believing its machinations, while never answering specific questions in regard to how it obtains its information, or the illegal actions which the Bureau continues to perpetrate in efforts to manipulate public opinion.

The FBI has become as aggressive as it has in this particular situation, because it the Bureau itself who has attempted to justify a precedent setting illegal fishing expedition which has ironically enough served to expose the Nazi origins of the NSA's Signals Intelligence operations, and brain fingerprinting of the entire U.S. population. Something which the bureau is obviously taking quite a bit of heat for behind the scenes.

The NSA's Signals Intelligence operations, and in particular its remote neural monitoring of the American people without their knowledge or consent, must eventually be exposed in a court of law, so that the American people themselves can be made aware of the extent to which agencies like the FBI and NSA are violating both their 4TH Amendment rights; as well as basic human rights under the Geneva Convention and Nuremberg Code.

This must be done at some point in the future, since at the moment there is absolutely no longer any constitutional rule of law in the United States of America. And the FBI and NSA are two of the most imminent threats to the sovereignty of the American people as the result of such complete and utter lawlessness.

Moreover, in order to cover up for their crimes, these agencies are trying many of us in the court of public opinion, because they cannot be challenged as they would be in a court of law.

Moreover, these agencies would never have attempted such egregious violations as they are at present, were it not for the Patriot Act; which is allowing the FBI and its Nazi brethren to decimate the inherent rights of any American citizens of their choosing.

For many of us, the attacks by these Intel agencies have become a matter of economics; not principle, since their attacks are based not on the law, but instead, on the cash register and the amount of money that they have already expended in their criminal conspiracies regarding those whom they illegally target.

The FBI continues to use its "useful idiots" to intimidate those whom it cannot prosecute, in further efforts to break these people physically, mentally, spiritually and financially. However, for many of us, the Bureau has been so criminal and equally vicious in its assaults, that we can never take them seriously as law enforcement. That is not to say that we don't take the FBI very seriously as a dangerous criminal enterprise, which the FBI has always been. And it is with such consideration that we document the FBI's crimes, including its obvious enough attempts in which to covertly murder us.

Furthermore, what continues to amaze many of those who've been targeted for such illegal tactics is the American public's own gullibility where the FBI is concerned. Since if the FBI had a decent case on any of those whom they are illegally targeting, there'd be no reason for the bureau to resort to the black propaganda smear campaigns that this Nazi run organization is presently propagating. Once again, the FBI will, as it always has, use its smoke and mirror "MO" in which to obscure some of the most outrageous violations of the Bill of Rights ever documented, while utilizing a cadre of "useful idiots" in which to muddy the waters even further.

For example, those whom the FBI would coerce into lying for it, have as little credibility as the FBI itself.

And given its total complicity in the cover up in regard to the attacks on 9-11, it is time that the FBI be forced to answer to the public as they have never done before. However, if the public continues to allow such an organization as the FBI to steamroll them as the Bureau has done for the past Century, then they have themselves to blame for not speaking up in defense of their rights.

This author has no intention of ever acknowledging the FBI as anything but the criminal and treasonous organization that it is, and I will go to my death promulgating their crimes, and complicity in the destruction of the United States of America.

The FBI relies on its fear tactics in which to control us as a nation. However, all the Bureau can do with those who don't fear it is to resort to its demonization and dehumanizing of such people. Further proof that this agency does not operate legally or humanely, and will eventually suffer the consequences for having violated such basic tenets of human rights. And regardless of how convincingly the FBI manages to con the American public.

Did the following article cost investigative journalist Mark Burdman his life?

Cheney's Role In 9/11 Put On
Center Stage By British MP
By Mark Burdman
Executive Intelligence Review.

For the first time, a prominent British political figure has aired his suspicions, that the group around U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney may have intentionally caused, or allowed to happen, the mega-terrorism in New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001, to set into motion an era of neo-imperial wars.

Labour Party Member of Parliament Michael Meacher wrote a major feature focusing on Cheney's Project for a New American Century grouping, in the London Guardian on Sept. 6. Meacher had resigned in June as Environment Minister, a post he held in Tony Blair's government for six years. This Summer's political wars in Britain, as EIR forecast they would, are drawing ever closer to Cheney.

This is the context in which Meacher took Blair to task for subordinating Britain's interests to Cheney and his neo-conservative gang in Washington. Ever since Lyndon LaRouche first affirmed, early in the morning of 9/11, that the attacks were an "inside job," it has been taboo in Britain to publicly discuss this possibility, especially as Blair's Britain joined in the neo-conservatives' wars against Afghanistan and Iraq, becoming the Cheney-acs' main prop overseas. And although Meacher's polemic narrows the motive of Cheney et al. to an oil grab, his intervention is timely.

On Sept. 7, just ahead of the second anniversary of 9/11, London was the scene of huge "anti-terror exercises," including contingency plans or the mass evacuation of the city. During that week, there was heavy police presence and Londoners were very nervous. One European strategist warned EIR Sept. 9, that London is the most likely target for a new act of mega-terrorism. But a London insider cautioned EIR, on the same day, that Blair and his minions are determined to stoke alarm, to "justify" his war policies and to divert attention from his political woes. Those woes are bound to get worse.

The Lord Hutton inquiry into the July 17 death of weapons expert Dr. David Kelly had produced startling revelations by Sept. 8, blowing apart the case Blair made last year for war against Iraq. One informed source affirmed Sept. 8: "This is only the beginning, and when the inquiry resumes next Monday [Sept. 15], things are going to get a lot tougher, when the process of cross-examining leading officials begins."

Other Labourites are joining the attack on Blair, including former International Development Secretary Clare Short, and former Leader of the House of Commons and former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook. On Sept. 8, Cook drew gasps from MPs, when he blasted Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon for having ignored the reservations of his own Defense Intelligence taff (DIS), about the fraudulent September 2002 dossier on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) issued by Blair's 10 Downing Street. Hoon was then jeered, when he tried to pass off responsibility for the dossier o Britain's Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC).

The next day, it was revealed that Hoon had given misleading evidence to the House of Commons Intelligence and Security Committee investigating the dossier in July, flatly denying that DIS experts had expressed such concerns. It is widely assumed that Hoon will soon bite the dust, closely following the Aug. 29 resignation of Downing Street chief spin doctor Alastair Campbell. In Sept. 8, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw came into the Hutton inquiry ire, as documents were released, showing his role in bringing Kelly's same into the public light, as the source for a BBC report that intelligence experts had regarded the September 2002 dossier as "sexed up."

Kelly's death followed shortly after his name was made public. It also came out that Hoon had played a role in "sexing up" that dossier, urging that references to Iraqi WMDs be strengthened and demanding a "killer paragraph" to make the case against Iraq stronger.

A U.K. intelligence expert told EIR Sept. 8, that these eruptions are creating a fertile environment, in which the issues Meacher has raised can now be "openly debated and considered.... The Hutton inquiry, and other factors, have raised enormous questions about why Tony Blair, in reality, wanted this Iraqi weapons dossier, and that, in turn, is focusing attention on the motives of the administration in Washington,
in starting the war in Iraq."

This bad news for Blair in Britain bodes ill for Cheney and Co., and all sorts of surprises may emerge. How nervous certain people are, is becoming clear from the wild attacks on Meacher's article: by the American Embassy in London; by Lord Conrad Black's Sunday Telegraph; and by Rupert Murdoch's Times.

'The Truth May Be a Great Deal Murkier'
Meacher's Guardian article was entitled, "This War on Terrorism Is Bogus," with the sub-title, "The 9/11 attacks gave the U.S. an ideal retext to use force to secure its global domination."

He began, that whereas "massive attention" has been paid to Britain's excuse for going to war, "far too little attention has focused on why the U.S. went to war; and that throws light on British motives too.

"The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan was a natural first tep in launching a global war against terrorism.

Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the U.S. and U.K. governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However his theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier."

He went on: "We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now Vice President), Donald Rumsfeld (Defense Secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), JebBush (George Bush's younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of taff). The document, entitled 'Rebuilding America's Defenses,' was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

"The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says 'while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.' "

Meacher noted that the PNAC blueprint supported an earlier document attributed to Wolfowitz and Libby which said the United States must discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership
or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role." This early-1990s Pentagon Guidance Document," a.k.a. "the Wolfowitz doctrine," prescribes pre-emptive military action, and implicitly, pre-emptive nuclear strikes, against potential challenges to an American or Anglo-American empire.

Cheney, then Defense Secretary in President H.W. Bush's Administration, supported this outrage, which was nixed then by senior Administration igures, including the President. With Bush Jr., the policy has been implemented.

In detailing the September 2000 PNAC blueprint, Meacher noted that it refers to allies such as the U.K., as "the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership." Further, the blueprint also calls for "regime change" in China, and advocates imperial control of space and cyberspace, and development of new biological weapons. "FinallyÑwritten a year before 9/11Ñit pinpoints North Korea, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes, and says their existence justifies the creation of a 'worldwide command and control system.'

This is a blueprint for U.S. world domination. But before it is dismissed as an agenda for rightwing fantasists, it is clear it provides a much better explanation of what actually happened before, during and after 9/11 than the global war on terrorism thesis. This can be seen in several ways."

Why Did U.S. Air Security Stand Down?
Meacher next presented his views, of what happened two years ago; EIR finds them worth reporting, including his attributed sources: "First, it is clear the U.S. authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9/11. It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the U.S. of the 9/11 attacks. Two senior Mossad experts were sent to Washington in August 2001 to alert the CIA and FBI to a cell of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation (Daily Telegraph, Sept. 16, 2001). The list they provided included the names of four of the 9/11 hijackers, none of whom was arrested.

"It had been known as early as 1996 that there were plans to hit Washington targets with aeroplanes. Then in 1999 a U.S. national intelligence council report noted that 'al-Qaeda suicide bombers could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the CIA, or the White House.'

"Fifteen of the 9/11 hijackers obtained their visas in Saudi Arabia. Michael Springman, the former head of the American visa bureau in Jeddah, has stated that since 1987 the CIA had been illicitly issuing visas to unqualified applicants from the Middle East and bringing them to the U.S. for training in terrorism for the Afghan war in collaboration with bin Laden (BBC, Nov. 6 2001). It seems this operation continued after the Afghan war for other purposes. It is also reported that five of the hijackers received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s (Newsweek, Sept. 15, 2001).

"Instructive leads prior to 9/11 were not followed up. French Moroccan flight student Zacarias Moussaoui (now thought to be the 20th hijacker) was arrested in August 2001 after an instructor reported he showed a suspicious interest in learning how to steer large airliners. When U.S. agents learned from French intelligence he had radical Islamist ties, they sought a warrant to search his computer, which contained clues to the Sept. 11 mission (Times, Nov. 3, 2001). But they were turned down by the FBI.

One agent wrote, a month before 9/11, that Moussaoui might be planning to crash into the Twin Towers (Newsweek, May 20, 2002). "All of this makes it all the more astonishingÑon the war on terrorism perspectiveÑthat there was such slow reaction on Sept. 11 itself. "The first hijacking was suspected at not later than 8:20 a.m., and the last hijacked aircraft crashed in Pennsylvania at 10:06 a.m. Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the U.S. Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles from Washington, D.C., until after the third plane had hit the Pentagon at 9:38 a.m. Why not? ... Between September 2000 and June 2001 the U.S. military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase suspicious aircraft (AP, Aug. 13, 2002).

It is a U.S. legal requirement that once an aircraft has moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to investigate. "Was this inaction simply the result of key people disregarding, or being ignorant of, the evidence? Or could U.S. air security operations have been deliberately stood down on Sept. 11? If so, why, and on whose authority?"

Meacher affirmed that "the catalogue of evidence does, however, fall into place when set against the PNAC blueprint. From this it seems that the so-called 'war on terrorism' is being used largely as bogus cover for achieving wider U.S. strategic geopolitical objectives. Indeed Tony Blair himself hinted at this when he said to the Commons liaison committee: 'To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on Sept. 11" (Times, July 17, 2002).

Similarly Rumsfeld was so determined to obtain a rationale for an attack on Iraq that on 10 separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq to 9/11; the CIA repeatedly came back empty-handed (Time magazine, May 13, 2002).

"In fact, 9/11 offered an extremely convenient pretext to put the PNAC plan into action. The evidence again is quite clear that plans for military action against Afghanistan and Iraq were in hand well before 9/11.

A report prepared for the U.S. government from the Baker Institute of Public Policy stated in April 2001 that 'the U.S. remains a prisoner of its energy dilemma. Iraq remains a destabilizing influence to ... the flow of oil to international markets from the Middle East.' Submitted to Vice President Cheney's energy task group, the report recommended that because this was an unacceptable risk to the U.S., 'military intervention' was necessary (Sunday Herald, Oct. 6, 2002)."

Errors of Judgment Meacher reported that "the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the U.S. into 'tomorrow's dominant force' is likely to be a long one in the absence of 'some catastrophic and catalyzing eventÑlike a new Pearl Harbor.' " He concluded with the charge that "the 'global war on terrorism' has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agendaÑthe U.S. goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force, command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project."

Important as is the publication of this charge, from Tony Blair's own party in Parliament, to narrow the "Cheney project" to a physiocratic grab for scarce energy supplies fails to grasp the "nature of the beast."

Cheney's neo-conservative faction is the modern-day embodiment of the fascist-synarchist forces, that threatened both the Britain and the United States in the 1940s. Pulling his strings are powerful financier forcesÑdescendants of those private banking families and financial interests who brought Adolf Hitler to power in Germany, and supported Mussolini's dictatorship in Italy. Their aim now, as then, is to establish a world empire that would salvage a crisis-ridden financial system, and eliminate the American humanist-republican tradition associated with Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin Roosevelt.

LaRouche has demonstrated that 9/11 was a "Reichstag Fire," allowing for dictatorial measures at home, and for Samuel P. Huntington's Clash of Civilizations pitting Western nations against Islam, and potentially China.

The game is much more dangerous than Meacher has described it. But with publication of his article, the "Reichstag Fire" issueÑand crucially, that of the relation between the Cheney's gang's desires and Tony Blair's actions as British Prime MinisterÑis out in the open.

Humor Of The Day -- The World's Largest Legitimized Counterfeiter, The Federal Reserve System Oversees The Truth In Lending Act

America From Freedom To Fascism -- The late film maker Aaron Russo exposes the U.S. Congress, privately held Federal Reserve System and Internal Revenue Service for their conspiracy in which to impose an unconstitutional tax on the American workforce; one which was created by the Illuminati with their passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913, when the engineers of this piece of treasonous legislation bribed a few U.S. Senators to pass this Act during the Christmas Holidays, when most of the Congress were on vacation. The Federal Reserve Act resulted in the creation of the privately held Federal Reserve System and the 16TH Amendment, which led to the creation of the IRS, and the fleecing of the American middle class through a Communistic system of illegal taxation used to enslave them to the privately held Federal Reserve System, and their Internal Revenue Service private collection agency.

So it's ironical that the greatest economic fraud in American history is in charge of the Truth in Lending Act; especially when considering that the Federal Reserve System's concept of the truth runs 180 degrees in the opposite direction. Much like the FBI "maggotship," which aids and abetts this criminal counterfeiter instead of working to shut down its money laundering operations.

America From Freedom To Fascism:

Thursday, January 29, 2009

The Following Article Is Proof That The FBI's Cold Blooded Torturers And Murderers Have Impunity To Kill Without Fear Of Prosecution

Amongst the FBI's myriad atrocities as a propagator of the New World Order's tyrannical doctrine, agent Lon Horiuchi's cold blooded murder of Vicki Weaver to this day stands out as perhaps the best illustration that no matter how horrible an FBI agent's crimes are, the Department Of Justice will not prosecute them.

The day after Vicki's murder, the FBI was camped out on the Weaver property, just finishing up breakfast, while Randy and his daughters were held up in a shed on their property, tending to Vicki's body, which had been nearly decapitated when Horiuchi fired into her kitchen the day before, as she held her 10 month old daughter, Allysheeba in her arms.

A day earlier, Weaver's 14 year old son, Sammy was shot in the back and killed by a federal marshal as he ran from him, after another Marshal had shot Sammy's dog to death. As the Weaver's grieved, the FBI savored their pain, as these sadistic psychopaths are conditioned to do. Several of them even received medals of commendation for what was nothing more than a federal entrapment scheme, which ended in the brutal murders of a mother and her young son.

An eyewitness account claims that as the Weavers were preparing Vicki for burial, that one of the FBI's agents stood up and stated in a mocking tone, "we had pancakes for breakfast, Randall, what did you have?" A statement made to inflict further damage to a wounded Randy Weaver, who had been shot in the back by another agent the day before; taunting Randy that his wife would no longer be able to make breakfast for his family, which now numbered four, rather than six.

Those who are familiar with the FBI's attack on the Weaver Family state that it was a tragedy. However, it was far more than that, and so were the FBI's unwarranted attacks on the Branch Davidians at WACO. What the FBI and its savages did in these cases was an outright slaughter.

There was no rule of law to be found in anything that the FBI did in these attacks, and what's worse is that neither the U.S. Congress nor the Department Of Justice took any meaningful actions in which to prevent such atrocities from happening again. And by meaningful I refer to the abolition of the FBI.

The same type of diabolical ideology demonstrated by the FBI at Ruby Ridge and WACO also led to the Bureau's attacks on the American Indian Movement, the Black Panther Party, The Socialist Workers' movement, EarthFirst!, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., actress Jean Seberg, and myriad other groups as well as individuals whom the FBI decided to simply get rid of through its Nazi idealized COINTELPRO operations; while completely disregarding the rights of these citizens.

Constitutionally protected rights which the FBI decided to blatantly disregard, when in reality this disgusting group of anti-American reprobates had no legal authority in which to do so.

And the FBI is continuing in the modern day to perpetrate such crimes against myriad American citizens, including this author and his family.

One way or another the FBI and its Illuminati run Nazi squad must be abolished, for they are now and always have been a Draconion plague on the American people.

Ruby Ridge Prosecutor Declines to Prosecute FBI Sniper

Friday, June 15, 2001

The manslaughter charge against the FBI sharpshooter who killed a woman during the Ruby Ridge standoff will be dismissed, an Idaho prosecutor announced Thursday.

Last week, a sharply divided 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled FBI sharpshooter Lon Horiuchi could face trial for the death of white separatist Randy Weaver's wife Vicki in the 1992 shooting in north Idaho.

But Boundary County Prosecutor Brett Benson said he will dismiss the involuntary manslaughter charge because it was unlikely the state could prove the case and too much time had passed.

Benson said he would file a motion in federal court in Boise, Idaho, on Friday to dismiss the charge brought by his predecessor Denise Woodbury, who lost to Benson in last year's election. Benson did not return a telephone message seeking comment.

Horiuchi's attorney, Adam Hoffinger, was out of the country and not available for comment Thursday.

Special Prosecutor Stephen Yagman, who was appointed by Woodbury to handle the case, criticized the decision and said he hoped a different prosecutor might refile the charge or bring a more severe charge.

"I could not disagree more with this decision than I do," Yagman said. "It sounds to me like the system has suffered a temporary corruption."

"The Ruby Ridge incident was a tragedy that deeply affected and divided many of the citizens of this county and country," Benson said in a news release from his office in Bonners Ferry, Idaho. "It is our hope that this decision will begin the healing process that is so long overdue."

The case was seen as a test of whether federal agents are immune from state prosecution. The federal government declined to prosecute Horiuchi, but last week's 6-5 ruling by the appeals court cleared the way for Idaho prosecutors to pursue charges against him.

The standoff at Ruby Ridge in north Idaho prompted a nationwide debate on the use of force by federal agencies. It began after government agents tried to arrest Randy Weaver for failing to appear in court on charges of selling two illegal sawed-off shotguns.

The Weaver's cabin had been under surveillance for several months when the violence began with the deaths of Deputy U.S. Marshal William Degan, Weaver's 14-year-old son, Samuel, and the family dog.

During the 11-day standoff, Horiuchi shot and killed Weaver's wife and wounded family friend Kevin Harris. Witnesses said the sharpshooter fired as Vicki Weaver held open the cabin door, her 10-month-old baby in her arms.

The standoff ended after Harris and Weaver surrendered. Both men were acquitted of murder, conspiracy and other federal charges. Weaver was convicted of failing to appear for trial on the firearms charge.

Horiuchi has said he didn't see Vicki Weaver when he fired at Harris, who was armed and was ducking inside the cabin. He also said he fired to protect a government helicopter overhead.

Charges against Horiuchi had been dismissed twice by federal courts, on the grounds that a federal agent on duty was immune from criminal prosecution.

The appeals court last week sent the case back to the federal court in Boise to determine if the sharpshooter had acted in a reasonable manner, and thus merited immunity. If a federal judge had ruled that Horiuchi acted unlawfully, then the case could have gone before a jury.

Those in dissent said the majority was using hindsight in "dissecting the mistakes" of Horiuchi. They called the majority's opinion a "grave disservice" to FBI agents and argued that Horiuchi, who is still an FBI agent, should be immune from prosecution.

The Justice Department last summer settled the last civil suit stemming from the standoff. The government admitted no wrongdoing, but paid Harris $380,000 to drop his $10 million civil damage suit.

In 1995, the government paid Weaver and his three surviving children $3.1 million for the killings of Weaver's wife and son.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.,2933,27300,00.html

Also see:

Kill a Boy, Get a Medal
by James Bovard, June 1996

On March 1, 1996, the U.S. Marshals Service gave its highest award for valor to five U.S. marshals involved in the 1992 Ruby Ridge, Idaho, shoot-out, including the marshal who shot a 14-year-old boy in the back and killed him, and another marshal who started a firefight by shooting the boy's dog without provocation. The valor award announcement symbolizes federal law enforcement's contempt for court verdicts, the Congress, and the American people.

The marshals received the award, according to U.S. Marshals Service Director Eduardo Gonzalez, for "their exceptional courage, their sound judgment in the face of attack, and their high degree of professional competence during this incident." Gonzalez declared: "When gunfire broke out on Ruby Ridge on that summer day, every member of the team came under fire at some point." Gonzalez labeled the men "heroes."

The Ruby Ridge story began with the entrapment of Randy Weaver, a white separatist, by an Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms informant, after which Weaver was indicted, and the U.S. Marshal's Service was assigned the job of arresting him. Once an indictment was handed down, the U.S. Marshals Service made capturing Weaver a high priority — even naming the mission to apprehend him "Operation Northern Exposure." A confidential Justice Department report later observed: "It appears at initial glance that the resources the marshals committed to the case were disproportionate to the relatively insignificant underlying charge."

The marshals spend the next year and a half spying on Weaver, sneaking around his land dozens of times, and erecting spy cameras to record all his family's movements. David Nevin, a lawyer involved in the subsequent court case, noted later:

"The marshals called in military aerial reconnaissance and had photos studied by the Defense Mapping Agency. . . . They had psychological profiles performed and installed $130,000 worth of solar powered long-range spy cameras. They intercepted the Weavers' mail. They even knew the menstrual cycle of Weaver's teenage daughter, and planned an arrest scenario around it."

The confidential report concluded that the August 1992 timing of the federal government's showdown with Weaver was largely a measure of political convenience for Henry Hudson, the acting director of the U.S. Marshals Service. The report noted:

"The plan to apprehend Weaver was delayed for three months pending the confirmation of Henry Hudson as the Marshals Service Director. The [U.S. marshals] reconnaissance team expressed frustration over the delay because some believed the delay caused a gap in their surveillance intelligence."

On August 21, 1992, six U.S. marshals sneaked onto Weaver's property, outfitted in full camouflage and ski masks and carrying submachine guns and other high-powered weapons. Three agents circled close to the cabin and threw rocks at the cabin in order to get the attention of Weaver's dogs. Alan Bock, in his excellent book, Ambush at Ruby Ridge (Dickens Press, 1995), stated that marshal Larry Cooper admitted at the trial "that [he] was carrying a silenced weapon because [he] had orders to lure the dogs and shoot them so the marshals could sneak up on the Weaver cabin without worrying about the dogs."

After the dogs began barking, Weaver's fourteen-year-old son, Sammy, and Kevin Harris, a twenty-five-year-old family friend who was living in the cabin, ran to see what the dogs were barking at.

At this point, the marshals took off running through the woods, followed by one dog. The marshals later told the FBI that they had been ambushed by the Weavers. However, according to a Justice Department confidential report, the marshals chose to stop running and take a stand behind stumps and trees. The report stated that Cooper "told the others that it was 'bullshit' for them to continue running and that he did not want to 'run down the trail and get shot in the back.' He urged them to take up defensive positions. The others agreed. . . . William Degan . . . took a position behind a stump approximately three to four feet off the right of the trail." The marshals had the advantage of surprise, camouflage, and vastly more firepower than the boy and Kevin Harris possessed.

The firefight began when marshal Arthur Roderick shot and killed the family dog, as a Senate subcommittee investigation concluded last December. Roderick and Cooper claimed that the first shot of the encounter had been fired by Kevin Harris and had killed marshal Bill Degan. But Captain Dave Neal of the Idaho State Police team that rescued the marshals twelve hours later stated that Roderick indicated that he had fired the first shot to kill the dog.

After his dog had been killed, Sammy fired his gun in the direction where the shots had come from. Sammy was running back to the cabin when, according to the federal government's ballistics expert at Weaver's 1993 trial, a shot from marshal Larry Cooper hit him in the back and killed him. Kevin Harris stated that he responded to Sammy's shooting by firing one shot into the woods to try to protect Sammy and to defend himself. Harris's shot apparently killed marshal Bill Degan; an Idaho jury later ruled that Harris acted in self-defense. Though Cooper and Roderick testified that Degan had not fired a shot, evidence later proved that he had fired seven shots.

Marshals Roderick and Cooper later stated that they had stayed huddled alongside Degan's body for the next twelve hours, afraid that they might be shot if they tried to carry Degan off the mountain — even though the Weavers had long since retrieved their son's body and gone back to their ramshackle cabin. Other marshals panicked and wrongly claimed that the Weavers had U.S. marshals "pinned down" for hours under heavy gunfire. In reality, the marshals fired far more shots at Sammy Weaver and Harris than Sammy and Harris fired at them. And the marshals had no arrest warrant for either Sammy or Kevin Harris — and thus had no right to open fire upon them.

Several places in the confidential report deal with the possibility of a government cover-up. After the firefight between the U.S. marshals and the Weavers and Kevin Harris, the surviving marshals were taken to a condominium to rest and recuperate. The report observed:

"We note that the marshals were kept together for several hours before giving their statements. We question the wisdom of keeping the marshals together at the condominium for several hours, while awaiting interviews with the FBI. Isolating them in that manner created the appearance and generated allegations that they were fabricating stories and colluding to cover-up the true circumstances of the shootings at the Y."

FBI Hostage Rescue Team snipers arrived on the scene. The Senate subcommittee report noted: "FBI agents who were briefed in Washington and in Idaho during the early stages of the crisis at Ruby Ridge received a great deal of inaccurate or exaggerated information concerning . . . the firefight." The marshals' gross mischaracterization helped pave the way to the FBI "shoot to kill" orders that led to the killing of Vicki Weaver.

Roderick and Cooper testified last September 15 before the Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearings chaired by Senator Arlen Specter, Republican from Pennsylvania, on the Ruby Ridge case. Cooper and Roderick stunned the committee by announcing that Randy Weaver had actually accidentally shot his own son. Though Sammy was shot as he was running in the direction of his father, and though Weaver was far away from the scene of his son's death and was located in front of him and at a higher elevation, and though his son was shot in the back by a bullet with an upward trajectory, Cooper insisted the father still somehow shot the son.

The only plausible theory that would explain how that could have happened would have been if Randy Weaver had been using "Roger Rabbit" cartoon bullets — bullets that could twist around trees, take U-turns, and defy all the laws of physics. Defense attorney Chuck Peterson observed:

"The evidence places Randy Weaver hundreds of feet up the hill and out of sight of the scene when Sammy was shot in the back. The bullet's trajectory can be placed from below the place where Sammy fell, as the lead projectile traveled upward from its entry point low in his back."

The jury foreman at the federal trial in 1993 characterized the new Cooper-Roderick theory as "[expletive deleted]" and told The Washington Post that "the government's story has changed every time you turn around."

The Senate subcommittee report concluded: "The Subcommittee . . . has seen no evidence which would support the Marshals' claim. . . ." The subcommittee has two independent experts analyzing the evidence on who shot the boy, and preliminary results have reportedly found nothing to support the latest Cooper-Roderick theory.

Cooper and Roderick insisted that they did not know that Sammy Weaver had been killed at the firefight and professed shock when the FBI reported finding the boy's body a few days later. Yet, an FBI agent who interviewed Marshals Service Director Henry Hudson in 1993 reported that Hudson said he knew of Sammy's shooting the same day it happened; Hudson last September denied to the Senate subcommittee making that statement, saying he was "perplexed" at the FBI official report. Jeffrey Howard, then-associate deputy attorney general, told Specter's subcommittee that he was informed on the morning of August 22, the following day, that Sammy Weaver had apparently been killed.

The marshals' dubious conduct is further indicated by the Marshals Service's refusal to do routine internal investigations after the fatal shootings. The Senate subcommittee noted:

"We were disappointed to learn that, based on his desire to avoid creating discoverable documents that might be used by the defense in the Weaver/Harris trial . . . former [Marshals Service] Director Henry Hudson decided to conduct no formal internal review of USMS activities connected with the Weaver case and the Ruby Ridge incident."

Last August 15, the Justice Department announced that it was paying the surviving Weaver family members $3.1 million to settle their wrongful-death lawsuit against the federal government. A Justice Department press release announced:

"The settlement reflects the loss to the Weaver children of their mother and brother. By entering into a settlement, the United States hopes to take a substantial step toward healing the wounds the incident inflicted."

Justice Department officials later insisted that the government admitted no wrongdoing in paying off the Weavers — yet, if that is the case, then the officials who approved the payoff should be indicted for squandering taxpayers' money. One Justice Department official explained the settlement to The Washington Post : "We recognized that an Idaho jury probably would give Weaver $200 million." Actually, it was probably sound judgment on the Marshals Service's part to delay giving valor awards to the marshals involved in killing Sammy Weaver until after the Weaver's lawsuit was settled; otherwise, the settlement might have cost taxpayers millions more.

Are marshals Cooper and Roderick getting the valor awards for "bravery" at Ruby Ridge — or for their courageous story-telling before the Senate Judiciary Committee? David Nevin, the Idaho lawyer who successfully defended Kevin Harris, notes that perjury by federal lawmen is a serious problem: "They know that if they show up with their broad shoulders and their neatly clipped hair they can say whatever they damn well please."

Does the Marshals Service believe that Americans are obliged to give the benefit of the doubt to people in Ninja outfits and face masks who jump out of the woods and begin firing submachine guns at them? Federal law enforcement agencies have yet to learn that they cannot brazenly shoot innocent Americans and then pretend that the agents involved should be treated like national heroes.

Mr. Bovard, the author of Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty (St. Martin's Press, 1994) and Shakedown (Viking Press, 1995), has written often on Ruby Ridge.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Webster Tarpley's 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism -- Were The Aircraft Used In The Attacks On 9-11 Equipped With A Global Hawk Satellite Tracking System?

"It definitely didn't look like a commercial plane. I didn't see any windows on the side. Again, it was not a normal flight that I've ever seen at an airport. It had a blue logo on the front , and it did not look like it belonged in the area."

-- FOX News Reporter, Mark Burnback regarding the real plane that hit the second Tower of the World Trade Center, not the fictional Flight 175 of the 9-11 Commission's Report.

The FBI's 9-11 Disinformation/Obstruction Of Justice

There are so many disinformation artists on the Internet in regard to 9-11, many of whom claim to be "insiders" who are in fact deliberately attempting to confuse the truth behind this inside government job.

However, there is no longer any question that 9-11 was perpetrated by an oligarchy within the U.S. Military Industrial complex that together with the Project For A New American Century, used the Bush puppet Administration to cover up. This as well as propagate the present war on terror hoax which the FBI has been aiding and abetting since shortly after 9-11-2001.

As such, there are few alternative researchers who have the background to understand the logistics of such a false flag operation, and who can truthfully explain to the civilian population why and how such operations were implemented.

Author Webster Tarpley is such a researcher; an expert on the U.S. Intelligence community, and one of the few insiders who's accurately reported on the inside job that 9-11 was; as well as the FBI's complicity in covering up virtually every aspect of the truth from the public; including seizing (and likely destroying) evidence from the Pentagon and World Trade Center.

Amongst his myriad observations, Mr. Tarpley has made a very sound case for the Pentagon's having been struck by a cruise missile; citing the basic characteristics of a cruise missile on route to its target, including the missile's turning abruptly at a severe angle, just before quickly accelerating into its target. Exactly what the object which struck the Pentagon did on 9-11-2001.

There is also the fact that these cruise missiles have friend or foe capabilities which enable them to travel through parts of their own countries while on route to an enemy target without being shot down. Tarpley believes that it is this function of the missile which he claims likely struck the Pentagon on 9-11-2001, that enabled the missile to evade detection as a foe, and enter the heavily protected airspace around the Pentagon.

It is also clear given the sophistication of this technology, that if in fact it was a missile that hit the Pentagon, its guidance system could have just as easily been used to hit the Capital Building or the White House. However, it wasn't used to damage these buildings, and instead only the reinforced portion of the Pentagon.

Whoever launched this cruise missile did not want to destroy Washington D.C. (because they are undoubtedly part of this bureaucracy), but to instead get close enough to the epicenter of this government, to make such an attack by government insiders seem plausibly deniable.

If these mercenaries wanted to truly destroy Washington D.C. , the Capital and White House would have been decimated along with several other key structures -- yet, they were left untouched. Just further proof that 9-11 was an inside job used as the catalyst in which to foment two wars which could not have been propagated without such a brazen attack. And to pass the Patriot Act, so that the inherent protections under the U.S Bill of Rights could be completely nullified, under the pretext of the war on terror mega lie.

Tarpley also states that these missiles have a reinforced front section referred to as the "jet" which enables them to penetrate several layers of steel reinforced concrete, as the one which hit the Pentagon apparently did on 9-11. Another important point here is that such missiles have tail sections like the one which the viewer can barely make out in the few heavily edited frames that the FBI begrudgingly released to the public several years ago. The tail section on this object is much lower than that of a 757, which would have been nearly as high as the area measured from the ground to the roof of the Pentagon.

Moreover, the object as Mr. Tarpley notes, is in fact white. The color of an American Airlines 757 is silver.

The testimony of a Pentagon worker by the name of April Gallop offers even more proof that the Pentagon was struck by a missile:

"I was buried in rubble and my first thought was for my son. I crawled around until I found his stroller. It was all crumpled up into a ball and I was very afraid. But then I heard his voice and I managed to locate him. We crawled out through a hole in the side of the building. Outside they were treating survivors on the grassy lawn. But all the ambulances had left, so a man who was near the scene stepped up, put us in his private car, and drove us to the hospital. The images are burned into my brain."

"They (the men who visited Gallop while she was recovering in the hospital -- more than likely FBI agents) never identified themselves or even said which agency they worked for. But I know they were not newsmen because I learned that the Pentagon told newsreporters not to cover survivors' stories or they would not get any more stories out of there. The men who visited all said they couldn't tell me what to say, they only wanted to make suggestions. But then they told me what to do, which was to take the (victims compensation fund) money and shut up.

They also kept insisting that a plane hit the building. They repeated this over and over. But I was there and I never saw a plane or even debris from a plane. I figure the plane story is there to brainwash people."

-- From the book 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism

There is no way that a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9-11-2001, and the U.S. Congress, the former Bush Administration, the FBI and the rest of the U.S. Intel community know it. They have all blatantly lied to the American people, as have the U.S. Media.

In regard to the most mysterious flight of them all, Flight 93, Tarpley also states that the official explanation for this plane being forced down by its passengers doesn't fit the forensics regarding the remnants of this craft.

His belief is that Flight 93 was shot down by an aircraft from either the U.S. Air Force or the shadow government which initiated these attacks. The eyewitness accounts of Flight 93 include people who saw at least one white aircraft circling Flight 93 before they heard an explosion. One of these witnesses, a woman by the name of Susan McElwain also had the following to say in regard to Flight 93:

"It came right over me, I reckon just 40 or 50 ft. above my mini-van. It was so low I ducked instinctively. It was traveling real fast, but hardly made any sound. Then it disappeared behind some trees. A few seconds later I heard this great explosion and saw this fireball rise up over the trees, so I figured the jet had crashed. The ground really shook. So I dialed 911 and told them what happened. I'd heard nothing about the other attacks and it was only when I got home and saw the TV that I realized it wasn't the white jet, but Flight 93. I didn't think much more about it until the authorities started to say there had been no other plane.

The plane I saw was heading right to the point where Flight 93 crashed and must have been there at the very moment it came down. There's no way I imagined this plane -- it was definitely military, it just had that look. It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the Internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around. Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3000 feet up. But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40 feet above my head. They did not want my story -- nobody here did." (London Daily Mirror, 2002)

"Ms. McElwain, a special education teacher, refused to accept the official version of what she saw, in part because of a conversation she had several hours after the fact with the wife of a friend of the family who is in the Air Force. According to McElwain, that friend said her husband had called her that morning and said 'I can't talk, but we've just shot a plane down.'

'I presumed they meant Flight 93. I have no doubt those brave people on board tried to do something, but I don't believe what happened on the plane brought it down. If they shot it down, or something else happened, everyone, especially the victims' families have a right to know.'" (London Daily Mirror, 2002)

There's also the alleged and now famous phone call from Todd Beamer to an employee of the GTE Airfone Customer Care Center in Oakbrook, Illinois, Lisa Jefferson. A call which Tarpley questions the veracity of, since Beamer was never actually able to speak directly with his wife, who was told of the events on Flight 93 ,which were alleged to have unfolded shortly before it crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

The story as told by Lisa Jefferson, that the occupants of this plane were about to storm the cabin and crash the plane instead of allowing it to be flown into Washington, D.C.

It is entirely possible that the alleged call from Beamer may have in fact never taken place at all, making the statement by Lisa Jefferson all the more dubious. However, if such a call took place, it's doubtful that the real Todd Beamer made the call; especially when one takes into consideration the fact that at the time, no technology was in place to effectively allow such calls to be made from 32,000 feet in the air (roughly the height at which Flight 93 was said to be traveling at the time it was shot down). It is also quite possible that voice morphing technology could have been used in which to duplicate the exact resonance of Todd Beamer's voice and then replicate it for the purpose of propagating disinformation in regard to the real fate of Flight 93 and its passengers.

If this in indeed the case, then this alleged phone call by Beamer could have also been used to serve as a diversionary tactic, removing any suspicion that Flight 93 may have been shot down by a missile.

There is also the fact that wreckage from Flight 93 was strewn over roughly eight miles before what was left of the airliner eventually crashed and disintegrated; indicative of Flight 93 being shot down, rather than deliberately crashed into the ground by its passengers.

One will recall that when TWA Flight 800 was accidentally shot down by the U.S. Navy off the coast of Long Island in 1996 (another incident which the FBI completely whitewashed through its own fabrications), that the wreckage was strewn over several miles of Long Island coastline.

From 9-11 Synthetic Terrorism:

"Rumsfeld, the FBI, and NORAD soon united on a common line: United 93 had not been shot down. The Bush administration was transparently eager to avoid the opprobrium of having shot down a commercial airliner carrying American citizens; this would have exposed the regime as impotent to defend the lives of its own citizens, but able to kill some of those citizens to protect top oligarchs in the White House and other Washington buildings. This would have led to an outcry from the victims' families far beyond anything that was in fact observed. "

Tarpley also notes that in all likelihood there may have been a special satellite tracking system aboard Flight 93 (Global Hawk) which could have automatically taken control of the plane in order to fly it remotely (quite possibly the same system that was used to fly planes into the World Trade Center Towers) in the event that the airliner was hijacked. And this technical aspect of Flight 93 may have been yet another reason for shooting the plane down.

Had the plane survived the crash and investigators found that it was equipped with a Global Hawk satellite tracking system, this would have also served to bolster the theory that the two planes flown into the World Trade Center Towers contained no passengers, and were in fact flown by way of remote means.

It is also entirely possible that there never were any hijackers on Flight 93.

Tarpley also notes that given that the largest piece of human remains found within miles of the crash site, was an eight inch piece of a passenger's spine, this gives more credibility to the theory that Flight 93 was in reality shot out of the sky by a missile or some type of directed energy weapon.

It is reassuring to find that Webster Tarpley, given his credibility as an author, has not only acknowledged that directed energy weaponry exists, but that it may have also been used during the attacks on 9-11. Specifically, he cites the way in which the steel beams which made up the super structure of the Towers were literally cut up into pieces during their collapse as well as melted.

The FBI has in fact gone to great lengths in which to seize and conceal evidence in every venue on 9-11, which could have led to the real perpetrators of the attacks within our own government. It is also clear that the hierarchy within the FBI knows who these perpetrators are, and is protecting them. The Bureau has intimidated legitimate witnesses into remaining silent, and taken every precaution to ensure that those within the shadow government in this country who perpetrated the attacks on 9-11 are never apprehended.

This has always been the FBI's function -- to protect the Illuminati elite within the United States while destroying evidence which could result in their prosecution. Further proof that the FBI is nothing more than a pawn of the wealthy Illuminati criminals in the United States, and which these elitest scoundrels use to attack their enemies, which is why the FBI relies heavily on its entrapment schemes and other coercive and illegal tactics. If people are not committing crimes, there is no need to entrap them, or to coerce others into doing so. Yet, this is how the FBI has operated under its guise as law enforcement for more than a Century.

Moreover, to think that the FBI would ever attempt to justify the warrantless spying of American citizens for literally hundreds of thousands of hours, while setting precedents in violating the Bill of Rights never before seen in the United States, is just a further indication of why the FBI is both inherently criminal and dangerous to the American middle class, and must be abolished at any and all costs.

Webster Tarpley has not only accurately identified these disturbing aspects of the FBI, but also done a superb job of identifying aspects of the attacks on 9-11-2001 which the FBI has deliberately attempted to conceal from the public. And given that the media system in this country has very comfortably adapted to the official lie, Tarpley's Ebook is one of the few places where an American citizen who still questions the veracity of the 9-11 Commission Report can learn the truth.

Tarpley has also proven through his research that although there are many alleged government whistle blowers in this country, only a scarce few are legitimate. And he is definitely in the latter category here, unafraid to document information which many other so called whistle blowers know about, but don't have the courage or character to reveal to the public.

9-11 Synthetic Terrorism can be read in its entirety at this Website:

The Lawsuit That Could Have Removed George W. Bush From The White House -- Was The FBI Involved In The Death Of Margie Schoedinger?

The following lawsuit has been removed from the Fort Bend, Texas Court House. Given Margie Schoedinger's allegations that the FBI refused to help her when she reported being attacked by George W. Bush and several other men, whom she believed to be either FBI agents or members of the Secret Service, and her subsequent death (likely murder made to appear as suicide), one must wonder if FBI agents may have been involved in the murder of Margie Schoedinger. Especially when one considers how she described the FBI's efforts to destroy her life and those of other family members through what can only be described as COINTELPRO tactics.

As a target of COINTELPRO I have experienced such extreme harassment as have my family members, given the FBI's extensive criminal attempts in which to murder me; including a demonization campaign used in which to obscure these outrageous crimes, which set numerous precedents in the violations of both my family's as well as my own rights as American citizens.

Moreover, Intel's psyops on my own family have been so vicious that there is no question that the FBI would also murder family members in these attacks. The FBI is a Nazi driven cancer on the human race. Notice in Margie Schoedinger's testimony the many different venues in which the FBI focused on in which to systematically destroy her life. This is the real FBI, not the Quinn Martin facade that was broadcast in the 1960's and 1970's on American Television; which gave a completely false and diametrically opposing representation of the FBI and its cadre of psychopathic minions.

The FBI is a New World Order enforcer of tyranny, intent on destroying the United States Bill Of Rights. A cadre of evil minded psychopaths who will torture and murder without conscience, provided that these agents believe that they can do so with plausible deniability. The FBI is an abjectly dangerous organization which should be abolished.


Plaintiff AT LAW NUMBER 3 vs.


Plaintiff is a resident of Fort Bend County, Texas, residing at XXXXX, Missouri City, Fort Bent County, Texas, 77459. Defendant is George W. Bush, Former Governor of Texas and current President of the United States and can be served with process at: Office of the President of the United States, Executive Office Building, The Executive Office of the President, Washington D. C. 20501.

II.On or about,October 26, 2000, an attempt was made to abduct Plaintiff by three unknown assailants. Because of the actions of these assailants, Sugar Land police officers were dispatched to the scene. In the end, no report was taken, the assailants were treated respectfully and allowed to go free while Plaintiff was repeatedly and aggressively questioned. After filing a lawsuit, Plaintiff's family and past contacts were questioned and harassed. As a result, Plaintiff dismissed Plaintiff's lawsuit. Irrespective of Plaintiff dismissing the lawsuit, the harassment continued. At some point, Plaintiff contacted the Houston office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, filing a raced based harassment complaint, advising that the Sugar Land Police Department may or may not be harassing Plaintiff on behalf of her neighbors in Sugar Land or possibly on behalf of the First Colony Community Services Association. The agent in question advised Plaintiff that the situation appeared to be highly organized and most likely higher level, such as a racist organization.

III. Eventually the harassment increased to the point where Plaintiff took the step of writing letters directly to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Houston Office. Instead of assisting Plaintiff with her concerns, the FBI took on the same demeanor as the Sugar Land Police Department. Eventually, Plaintiff learned, via telephone conversations, that both the Sugar Land Police Department and the Houston Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigations were acting at the behest of the Defendant, George W. Bush. As a part of their defense, the Sugar Land Police Department conducted a background investigation into Plaintiff's past activities. In the end, this investigation yielded the following information: Plaintiff had seven dates, (which became seven lovers), had told no lies, committed no crimes, gotten 2 traffic tickets and dated George W. Bush as a minor.

IV. Instead of looking at this information and keeping this information concealed, both agencies began revealing this information within their own intranets. In an effort to defend himself, the Defendant and his representatives began contacting Plaintiff regarding the relationship. While Plaintiff assured the Defendant and his representatives that she neither personally revealed this information, nor would she confirm it in any setting, the Defendant, his family and his representatives continued to threaten Plaintiff.

V. In the end, Plaintiff learned that while the Defendant and his representatives requested that she be harassed at all costs by both agencies, the Defendant also informed Plaintiff that his only option to assure his never having to answer for the previous contact would be to simply see Plaintiff pressured to the point of committing suicide. Plaintiff s opinion was that Defendant should simply leave Plaintiff to pursue a second attempt at a degree, even a PHd. Additionally, even if the previous contact were revealed in the future, it would be of no consequence. In response to Plaintiff s refusal to give in, Plaintiff s bank account has been expunged, Plaintiff s husband has been dismissed from his place of employment, and Plaintiff has been raped and beaten -which resulted in a miscarriage. Upon going to the hospital, Plaintiff was threatened by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on behalf of the Defendant. The purpose being to keep Plaintiff from remaining in the hospital and be administered thorough treatment. The reason being that the Defendant might have been the father of the child that was lost.

VI. Now Plaintiff continues to be threatened. According to the office of the Defendant and the Defendant, Plaintiff s background has been ruined, Plaintiff will never be able to have a clean credit bureau, Plaintiff's husband will never be able to find a job, Plaintiff degrees will continue to be expunged as well as any other achievement on Plaintiff's parts, Plaintiff will be placed on an AIDs watch list for the rest of her life, watched by the CIA, harassed by the Secret Service, placed on the National Security Agency's Photo Array, (which would cause Plaintiff to be considered as a suspect in any crime where the suspect remotely fits Plaintiff s description), Plaintiffs home is under surveillance in a manner that is fully recordable in all aspects and this surveillance is able to be loaded onto an internet page within minutes; including but not limited to prison Web sites, military web sites and any internet locale that might cause Plaintiff to be killed, raped, beaten or put in harms way.

Moreover, the Defendant took personal responsibility for these decisions, explaining to Plaintiff that committing suicide would be her best option as in his opinion; Plaintiff is essentially dead in any case. No matter what Plaintiff's background was before, no matter how pristine, Plaintiff would be destroyed completely. At this point, the question repeatedly became whether or not the Defendant could have fathered the child and whether or not the hospital had actually collected the pathology on the unborn child.

Finally, we decided that Plaintiff should be killed rather than being harassed to the point of committing suicide. However, the defendant stated he could not convince anyone he could trust to keep the secret to do this for him. The decision then became that the defendant should kill the Plaintiff personally. Instead of following through and just killing Plaintiff', defendant decided to go forth and ruin Plaintiff's life instead. This is the cause of Plaintiff filing this lawsuit,

VII. Throughout this conversation, Plaintiff learned that there was no time that the Defendant ever stopped watching Plaintiff, nor did he stop having sex with Plaintiff. The sole concern of the Defendant and his representatives was whether Plaintiff could actually recall the individual sex crimes committed against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's husband, utilizing drugs. Whether or not Plaintiff's husband was raped remains in question, as Plaintiff was drugged after she was raped and her husband was drugged before her rape. Plaintiff can only state that these men purported to be FBI agents raping her for the purpose of covering for how many times they had drugged her and allowed the Defendant to rape her in the same manner.

VIII. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges allegation in Paragraphs I through VII. Plaintiff has sustained 1 million dollars in actual damages and seeks punitive damages in the amount of 49 million dollars for reasons of emotional distress, loss of freedom and ability to pursue Plaintiff's own dreams, alienation of affection from Plaintiff's spouse, loss of privacy, being disparaged on the internet, and loss of Plaintiff ability to be a Christian writer. Plaintiff has suffered all of the aforementioned and more as a result of Defendant's actions as described herein.

Plaintiff prays that in addition to the aforementioned recovery, Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs in preparing this action for trial, pursuing any necessary appeal of this action and retaining an attorney to pursue said action.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Defendant, be sited to appear and answer, and that on final trial, Plaintiff be granted the following:

1. Judgment against defendant for actual damage suffered by the Plaintiff.

2. Judgment against the defendant for punitive damage.

3. A further judgment against the defendant in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of the court.

4. Costs of Suit.

5. Pre-Judgment Interest.

6. Post-Judgment Interest.

7. Such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled.


Dated this 2nd day of December, 2002

Margie D. Schoedinger

Calling All Investigative Journalists

"Margie Schoedinger, the Texas woman who accused George W. Bush of statutory rape and forcing an abortion upon her, has been found dead. Everyone who believes it was suicide, raise your hand. According to the Houston Chronicle, "MARGIE D. SCHOEDINGER expired Monday, 9/22/03. Visitation: Friday, 9/26/03 , 7 to 9pm, McCoy & Harrison Chapel. Funeral Service: Saturday, 9/27/03, 1:30pm, McCoy & Harrison Chapel. Interment, Houston Memorial Gardens." This site, where Schoedinger's lawsuit was originally posted, now says "The requested URL was not found on this server." Might I point out that the above lawsuit claims "the Defendant also informed Plaintiff that his only option to assure his never having to answer for the previous contact would be to simply see Plaintiff pressured to the point of committing suicide." Anyone wanna guess how much money will be spent by the Federal government investigating the mysterious death of Margie Schoedinger? Where's her NBC movie-of-the-week?

Amazingly enough, even the National Inquirer didn't have balls enough to inform its readers about the black woman from Texas who accused Dubya of rape, then was found dead of a gunshot wound to the head - considered "suicide" by all those who've bought real estate on Mars. The only paper to print the story of her death? The New Nation, a small paper that serves the black community of London."


Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Revisiting The FBI's Nasty COINTELPRO Against The Daughter Of Malcolm X

When it comes to the FBI's evil machinations, nothing that this Nazi blowhard of an organization does any longer surprises me. FBI agents are trained to despise liberalism and the activist groups which propagate basic human rights and an anti-war ideology.

The FBI's illuminati roots have seen to it that its agents are diametrically opposed to such doctrine, instead favoring an adherence to violence and support of the war cause, under the pretext of nationalism. The Bush Administration's "Support Our Troops" propaganda is one of the best illustrations of such rampant nationalism.

In fact one will remember how "Support Our Troops" car window stickers surfaced practically overnight across the United States a few years ago, as a result of the Bush initiated White House Iraq Group's propagation of the war on terror. And the average American bought into this farce hook, line and sinker as their kids were sent off to fight a war based on a complete Mega Lie; a false flag operation which has only served the Illuminati's core group of ultra wealthy scoundrels, and with devastating consequences for the American, Iraqi and Afghani proletariat.


By Paul DeRienzo

Informants are the stock in trade of the FBI when the bureau sets out to destroy popular movements. During the height of the civil rights movement in the 1960s, the FBI, under director J. Edgar Hoover, launched their so-called COINTELPRO operation against black radicals. The stated purpose was to prevent the rise of what
the bureau termed a "black messiah" who Hoover feared could unite African-American people against the United States government.

After COINTELPRO was exposed in the 1970's, the FBI claimed the operation had been discontinued and that reforms in the Bureau would prevent any similar assault on American citizens' right to peaceful protest. But the recent federal indictment in Minneapolis of Qubilah Shabazz, a daughter of Malcolm X, for allegedly plotting
the assassination of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan seems to indicate the spirit of J. Edgar Hoover is alive and well at the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

At the heart of the government's case against Shabazz is a long time informant for the FBI, Michael Fitzpatrick, 34, who is currently facing charges for possession of cocaine in Minneapolis. Prosecutors say Fitzpatrick tipped off the FBI after Shabazz allegedly let him in on her desire to kill Farrakhan, a man suspected of having been involved in her father's assassination in a fusillade of bullets on February 21, 1965 in Harlem's Audubon Ballroom.

Qubilah, her mother Betty Shabazz, and three of her sisters witnessed the slaying.

Among those who suspect Farrakhan's involvement is Betty Shabazz, who told reporters last year of her suspicion and added that it was "common knowledge." Her comments led to an article in the New York Post accusing Farrakhan of planning the assassination, prompting a multi-billion dollar libel lawsuit by the Nation of Islam against the Post. However, Farrakhan does admit to helping create a climate of hatred and hostility towards Malcolm X due to a bitter feud between Malcolm and Nation of Islam founder Elijah Muhammad, though he denies having had any role in planning the murder of Malcolm X.

The government's evidence against Shabazz, who has pleaded not guilty, is a stack of 20 audiotapes of conversation between her and Fitzpatrick and a 50 minute videotape that Fitzpatrick secretly made in a Minneapolis area motel room. According to reports in the Minneapolis Star Tribune that quote a federal official, on the videotape, Fitzpatrick does most of the talking, encouraging Shabazz to go
along with the plot against Farrakhan, while she objects that innocent people might be killed.

Who is Michael Fitzpatrick? Michael Fitzpatrick began his political career as an informant while a teenager attending the United Nations International School in Manhattan, where Shabazz was also a student. Fitzpatrick, the son of an Irish union organizer and a Jewish businesswoman, joined the Jewish Defense League and was the chief government informant in a 1978 case in which two militant Jews were convicted of plotting to blow up Egyptian government offices in Manhattan. According to activist attorney William Kunstler, Fitzpatrick actually provided the dynamite that was supposed to be used in the attack.

Fitzpatrick had become an informant when he was convicted in the 1977 bombing of the pro-Soviet Four Continents bookstore in Manhattan. According to court documents, he was paid about $10,000 to inform on the two JDL members involved in the Egyptian bombing plot, Bruce Berger and Victor Vancier. Berger currently works for an organization that aids Jewish immigrants in the United States.

Vancier resumed his militant Jewish activism since his 1991 release from prison after a 5 year jail term for several unrelated bombing charges.

Vancier is the host of "Positively Jewish" and "The Jewish Task Force," public access cable television shows in New York City. He has used the shows to denounce blacks, Israeli leaders and to praise Baruch Goldstein, the militant Israeli settler and former Brooklynite who slaughtered 29 Muslims as they worshipped at a Hebron mosque last year.

According to another former JDL member, Stephen Rambam, Fitzpatrick was also a part of SOIL, or Save Our Israeli Land, a protest organization that included Vancier and Dov Hikind, now a Democratic State Assembly member from Brooklyn.

Another JDL member and associate of Fitzpatrick in the late 1970's was Mordecai Levy. Levy says despite his hatred of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, he firmly believes Qubilah Shabazz was set up by the FBI. Levy claims Fitzpatrick has a long history of infiltrating various political groups in order to set them up
for arrest. One of the groups says Levy, was the Revolutionary Youth Movement, an arm of the former Communist Workers Party, whose members Fitzpatrick reportedly trained in the use of firearms.

According to Levy, the question to ask Fitzpatrick is why he continued as an informant even after he was already off the hook on the earlier bombing charges. Levy told the SHADOW: "a lot of times informants become addicted to the money, the glory, or the task. I think he had all three. He was a mercenary, a pirate, a
freebooter, he enjoyed the work, he enjoyed putting people away."

Levy doesn't hesitate to express his hatred of Louis Farrakhan, a man he refers to as a "black Hitler," but Levy told the SHADOW that despite the enmity he holds for the Nation of Islam leader, he's concerned that "this innocent girl, Malcolm X's daughter, not be framed." Levy added that if the FBI can use someone like Fitzpatrick to "set-up" Shabazz, "today its her, tomorrow it could be a Jewish group, it could be a legitimate African-American group, it could be a gun club... If they can get away with framing Malcolm X's daughter who has no track record of any anti-semitic or anti-white or anything activity -- [then] that's despicable."

After informing in the Egyptian offices bombing case, Fitzpatrick disappeared into the federal witness-protection program, which moved him into a Minneapolis suburb under the name of Michael Summers. In the 1980's, he drifted back and forth between New York and Minneapolis before settling there again four years ago. Chris Gunderson was a member of a local anarchist collective when Fitzpatrick became a regular at Backroom Anarchist Books, the group's organizing center.

Gunderson told the SHADOW that it was at an October 16, 1986 demonstration called "Minneapolis is Revolting" targeting corporations involved with the military-industrial complex in Minneapolis that he first saw Fitzpatrick. A scuffle broke out with police as protestors attempted to take to the streets and Fitzpatrick was in the middle of the action. Gunderson says that Fitzpatrick "represented himself.. as having been a member of the Communist Workers Party who had been assigned to do youth work in the punk scene and that in the course of that he had been won over
to anarchism."

Gunderson adds that Fitzpatrick suggested that one of the reasons he left the Communist Workers Party was because he felt the group had "chickened-out and not proven themselves committed to...militancy. And thereby set a standard for militancy that he wanted everyone else to live up to. That was one of his main ways of advancing the idea that people needed to escalate their tactics in ways that were quite clearly foolish and inappropriate. But at the time he cut an impressive figure and was able to influence people for a certain amount of time."

The web of deceit began to unravel after Fitzpatrick started bringing weapons into the bookstore, sparking suspicion among some of the anarchists. According to Gunderson, Fitzpatrick brought a can of "police-issue mace into the bookstore. The mace was then discovered by the police when they came into the bookstore shortly after he had left. [The police said] they were looking for a runaway at the time." Gunderson adds that the anarchists noticed "a pattern of actions and encouragement from him that seemed to us over time to constitute an effort to set us up."

William Kunstler is co-counsel representing Qubilah Shabazz along with Inner-City Broadcasting founder Percy Sutton. Both attorneys represented Malcolm X during the 1960's and are still active in progressive politics. Interviewed by the SHADOW, Kunstler said that "the real purpose" behind Fitzpatrick's attempt to "stimulate Qubilah Shabazz into a conspiracy to assassinate Louis Farrakhan" was to get Farrakhan killed, "not by her, but to stimulate that enmity again between those who loved Malcolm and those who followed Elijah Muhammad into an internecine civil war that resulted in so many deaths in the 60''s a dirty business engineered by the prevent the rise of what Hoover used to call a black Messiah."

Although Louis Farrakhan's racial rhetoric has aroused animosity among many whites, he is still a popular figure in the African-American community, in part because he's perceived as standing up for young black men. According to Kunstler, "Farrakhan for better or for worse is the only national black leader with that charisma. He can fill Yankee Stadium and they want to cut him down."

At a packed assembly of Nation of Islam members in Chicago last month, Farrakhan accused the FBI of trying to create conflict and division between the Nation and the family of Malcolm X. Farrakhan also accused the FBI of lying to Nation of Islam leaders about the plot. According to Farrakhan's lawyer Ava Muhammad, the FBI had said that a Muslim extremist group -- not a Malcolm X family member -- had been
involved in the plot to kill Farrakhan.

William Kunstler says he's interested in the role of the Clinton Administration's Justice Department in the Qubilah case. Kunstler told the SHADOW that "first the Attorney General's office said we knew nothing about this -- four days later, they said we knew all about it. It's my suspicion they of course knew all about it,
but first they denied it which is very interesting."

Kunstler also addressed charges by Minneapolis prosecutors that Qubilah had neglected her son, Malcolm X's grandson, also named Malcolm. Kunstler said with a hint of contempt that "prosecutors announced someone said Qubilah had `liquor on her breath' -- that's a great sin I guess." Kunstler says the abuse charge was
"dispelled totally because the authorities found it was totally unfounded."

If convicted, Qubilah Shabazz faces up to 90 years in prison and more than two million dollars in fines. The trial has been postponed until May 1st and Kunstler says while "the only fair trial would be no trial at all, I have a suspicion there maybe no trial at all." According to Kunstler, new information may further undercut the government's case against Shabazz.

Former FBI agent Dan Scott held a press conference in Minneapolis to say he had been the case agent for Michael Fitzpatrick back in the late 1970's. Scott told reporters that Fitzpatrick was an idealistic and credible witness, but according to Kunstler, former agent Dan Scott was himself kicked out of the FBI for drunkenness and killing someone in a car accident.

Kunstler adds "there's a puppeteer pulling the strings and there are lots of puppets out there." And the strings attached to Michael Fitzpatrick run straight back to the FBI.

untitled.bmp (image)


Wikio - Top Blogs

"The Mother Of All Black Ops" Earns A Wikio's Top Blog Rating

Julian Assange's WikiLeaks Alternative Media's Been Wrongfully Bankrupted By The U.S. Military Intelligence Complex

Rating for

Website Of The Late Investigative Journalist Sherman Skolnick