(fMRI) Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technology In Both Wired & Wireless Forms Is Unconstitutional & Destined To Fail
"Juries are supposed to decide the credibility of the witness, and fMRI lie detection, even if it could be proven completely accurate, infringes on that right. Juries are supposed to determine if a witness is credible and take from that witness what is true. That’s how our system works.”
"Until it can be proven that an fMRI can differentiate between a real event and a false memory, they have no value. We all know people who have told a lie so many times that they start believing it themselves. Such people are capable of passing a polygraph with ease, because they no longer consider themselves to be lying.
They could also likely pass an fMRI.
From what I have read, the fMRI attempts to distinguish the difference between recalling a memory and creative thinking. All these tests have been done in a lab, by a volunteer who was trying to help the researchers.
How would an fMRI distinguish between a real memory, and the memory of a lie you planned and rehearsed earlier?
Overall polygraphs have been shown to be inaccurate and misleading. There is a very good reason they are not admissible in court.
I have little doubt that in time fMRI's will be shown to be equally ineffective. I just hope no-one gets executed before that happens."
A Brooklyn Judge dismisses fMRI brain scan evidence as unconstitutional. The U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) has been secretly using a wireless form of this fMRI technology on the American people for several decades, and as the direct result of a clandestine brain fingerprinting program which the NSA implemented in the United States in the early 1980's.
This is why the Intelligence community is attempting to force the U.S. Judicial System into accepting the use of a wired form of fMRI in America's courts of law, which relies on a person's brain being hooked up to electrodes, in order to electronically scan the person's thoughts.
The wired form of fMRI must be conducted with the permission of the test subject, however, the NSA has been using the wireless form of fMRI on millions of Americans without their permission, which qualifies as non consensual human experimentation.
If the Intelligence community succeeds in eventually forcing the U.S. Judicial System to adopt this wired form of fMRI technology, the Intel community will then attempt to grandfather in the wireless fMRI brain scans that agencies like the NSA have been illegally collecting on millions of American citizens, since the early 1980's; when the NSA first deployed this satellite based spy technology on a national and possibly even international scope, via the use of its Signals Intelligence EMF Scanning Network.
Through the use of wireless fMRI brain scanning, the NSA has destroyed the American people's Constitutional rights to due process of law under the 6Th Amendment, their 5Th Amendment right to avoid self incrimination, and their 4Th Amendment right to privacy.
Moreover, because all Americans have been secretly brain fingerprinted, any person living in the United States can be subjected to the wireless tracking of their brain's own unique EMF frequency, without their knowledge or consent.
So is it any wonder why the NSA is attempting to whitewash the allegations regarding its SIGNIT EMF Scanning Network, while demonizing those of us (including former NSA employee, John St. Clair Akwei) who are exposing the NSA's treasonous spying, and destruction of the United States Constitution?
posted by James F. Marino at 9:03 AM
See: John St. Clair Akwei VS NSA 
NSA Remote Neural Monitoring Of The American People's Brains And The Concept Of Punishing People For Their Thoughts Has Become A Reality In The United States
<< Home