Just Months Before The Attacks On 9-11-2001 The FBI Was Already In Big Trouble -- The FBI Does Not Need Reform - It Needs To Be Abolished
The following quotes have been taken from the July 2001 article entitled:
FBI Story: Inside Look at Agency in Need of Reform
Charles R. Smith
"Agents or Weapons? Clearly, the problems faced by the FBI cannot be corrected by a simple count of guns. The real problem is not the gun but the weapon that is created when you turn a human being into an FBI agent. You can audit guns, but can you defuse a person?"
"Sex in the FBI. Allegations of sex and the FBI are an issue that has never been confronted. There are long-standing allegations that FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover often wore a dress. There are also allegations that the FBI has used prostitutes for commercial espionage.
The allegations first surfaced in Insight magazine when investigative journalist Tim Maier wrote that underage male and female prostitutes were being used to obtain intelligence information from foreign diplomats during the December 1993 Asia Pacific Economic Conference (APEC) in Seattle."
"This week the FBI proudly announced that an audit of its firearms revealed that more than 100 weapons were missing or stolen. One stolen FBI weapon had in fact been used for a murder. The 2001 FBI firearms audit, although incomplete, is long overdue for an agency that showed years ago it needed to be reformed.
Take, for example, the 1996 case of FBI agent Gary Harlow, former instructor at the Quantico training facility. In 1996, Harlow left his elite instructor job at Quantico and began working on for the Clinton White House, doing top-secret clearances.
Then one summer night, Harlow had an argument with his wife. He allegedly punched her in the face, whereupon she fled for medical care. It was while getting her broken nose fixed that Mrs. Harlow informed the doctors about how well armed her FBI agent husband was. The doctors immediately informed the local police.
When police arrived at Harlow's house they did not find him home but instead stumbled upon a huge cache of weapons. Somehow, over the years at the FBI academy, Harlow had managed to acquire more than 100,000 rounds of ammunition, night-vision gear, plastic explosive, hand grenades, gas masks and machine guns - all of it marked 'Property of the FBI.'
The punch line? The FBI did not fire Harlow for stealing the guns and ammo. The FBI decided to terminate his employment only after he confessed to also faking some White House clearances.
Agents or Weapons?
Clearly, the problems faced by the FBI cannot be corrected by a simple count of guns. The real problem is not the gun but the weapon that is created when you turn a human being into an FBI agent. You can audit guns, but can you defuse a person?"
Here is Charles R. Smith's article in its entirety sourced from Newsmax.com
FBI Story: Inside Look at Agency in Need of Reform
Charles R. Smith
Thursday, July 19, 2001
This week the FBI proudly announced that an audit of its firearms revealed that more than 100 weapons were missing or stolen. One stolen FBI weapon had in fact been used for a murder. The 2001 FBI firearms audit, although incomplete, is long overdue for an agency that showed years ago it needed to be reformed.
Take, for example, the 1996 case of FBI agent Gary Harlow, former instructor at the Quantico training facility. In 1996, Harlow left his elite instructor job at Quantico and began working on for the Clinton White House, doing top-secret clearances.
Then one summer night, Harlow had an argument with his wife. He allegedly punched her in the face, whereupon she fled for medical care. It was while getting her broken nose fixed that Mrs. Harlow informed the doctors about how well armed her FBI agent husband was. The doctors immediately informed the local police.
When police arrived at Harlow's house they did not find him home but instead stumbled upon a huge cache of weapons. Somehow, over the years at the FBI academy, Harlow had managed to acquire more than 100,000 rounds of ammunition, night-vision gear, plastic explosive, hand grenades, gas masks and machine guns - all of it marked "Property of the FBI."
Harlow was arrested in his car shortly thereafter. The arresting officers noted that Harlow had seven machine guns with him in the car. At his trial Harlow pleaded guilty to "theft of government property" and was declared "not a threat to society" by a federal judge, who gave him a year in jail.
The punch line? The FBI did not fire Harlow for stealing the guns and ammo. The FBI decided to terminate his employment only after he confessed to also faking some White House clearances.
Agents or Weapons?
Clearly, the problems faced by the FBI cannot be corrected by a simple count of guns. The real problem is not the gun but the weapon that is created when you turn a human being into an FBI agent. You can audit guns, but can you defuse a person?
For example, there is the strange tale of two former FBI agents, Eugene and Marguerite Bennett. Eugene Bennett was fired from the FBI in 1993 after he pleaded guilty to fraud and obstruction, involving money stolen from the agency. He was sentenced to one year in prison. Mrs. Bennett left the FBI after she admitted she had lied under oath to protect her husband.
On June 23, 1996, Eugene Bennett kidnapped the Rev. Edwin Clever at gunpoint. Bennett then forced Clever to call Mrs. Bennett and tell her she was needed at Prince of Peace United Methodist Church for an unspecified emergency.
Mrs. Bennett suspected the call from her clergyman was forced and that her husband was up to no good. Thus, she decided to go to church with a gun. Upon arriving at the church, she confronted her husband and she fired one shot at him, which missed.
Eugene Bennett was arrested later at his home after a brief standoff with police. According to Bennett, he had to lock up his "evil alter-ego Ed" in the garage before surrendering.
Further investigation by police led to the discovery of a bomb in a locker at Northern Virginia Community College (NVCC) in Woodbridge, where Marguerite Bennett worked as a police supervisor. More explosive materials were found in a locker at NVCC's Annandale campus. In addition, a pipe bomb was found outside Prince of Peace Church right after Eugene Bennett was arrested.
At the center of this battle was a messy divorce between the Bennetts. Bennett had previously contended in divorce papers that his wife was having a lesbian affair with best-selling crime novelist Patricia Cornwell.
According to Bennett, Cornwell and his wife would meet frequently after hours at a gay bar near the FBI Quantico training facility. At the time of the incident, Cornwell was attending the Quantico Virginia FBI facility at the special invitation of Director Louis Freeh.
The punch line? Neither Mrs. Bennett nor Cornwell's agent would comment on Bennett's allegations.
Sex in the FBI
Allegations of sex and the FBI are an issue that has never been confronted. There are long-standing allegations that FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover often wore a dress. There are also allegations that the FBI has used prostitutes for commercial espionage.
The allegations first surfaced in Insight magazine when investigative journalist Tim Maier wrote that underage male and female prostitutes were being used to obtain intelligence information from foreign diplomats during the December 1993 Asia Pacific Economic Conference (APEC) in Seattle.
In 1998, this reporter filed a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request seeking all information on the use of prostitutes as agents during the 1993 APEC conference. In response, the FBI found 250 pages of materials concerning the surveillance of foreign officials at the Seattle economic conference.
According to the FBI, only 13 pages of the "SECRET" and "TOP SECRET" documentation could be released. Some of the documents not released by the FBI "originated with another Government agency." Government censors heavily blacked out many of the secret documents returned by the FBI.
One such FBI "SECRET" document, dated November 1993, contains a partially blacked-out passage, noting that the FBI needed to gather surveillance data "in ample time for the information to be disseminated to Secret Service and Department of State."
Another secret November 1993 document, marked from "DIRECTOR FBI" to "FBI SEATTLE", directs the FBI office in Washington state to pay particular attention to a certain foreign "delegation" whose identity remains blacked out as secret. According to the heavily classified document, the "referenced communication provided information from a sensitive and reliable WF source."
I am told by an inside source that, much like the McVey case, more documents on the FBI use of prostitutes for economic espionage were recently discovered and that I should pursue the subject with the agency. A better question is: why?
There are many reasons to reform the FBI. Watergate, Clipper chip, Carnivore, Wen Ho Lee, McVey, White House travel office, TWA 800, the Atlanta Olympics, 900 missing files, Ruby Ridge and Waco to just name a few. Perhaps there are other reasons to reform the FBI such as Gary Harlow or the Bennetts.
Just what do you want a federal police to do? The real question for you the reader is what do you want the FBI to be? Do you change the system or change the people? How would you reform the FBI?
Before you answer, consider this final gem. The FBI's top counter-intelligence agent Robert Hannsen was a leading candidate to become the next FBI director until he was caught selling secrets to Moscow.
June 18, 2009
The Waning Power Of Truth
By Paul Craig Roberts
David Ray Griffin, the nemesis of the collection of disinformation known as the 9/11 Commission Report, has taken up the question of Osama Bin Laden, Dead or Alive?
On the basis of the available evidence, Griffin concludes that bin Laden died in December 2001, most likely of kidney failure. He has been kept alive in the media by US government PSYOPS as a useful bogyman to justify America’s illegal wars of aggression. The messages received from bin Laden since his death appear to be conveniently timed fabrications designed to advance US government purposes.
Osama bin Laden is likely to become a mythical person, like the Georgia Tech student, George P. Burdell, who will be sighted from time to time over a period that exceeds the length of a human life.
It was less than one year ago that Americans were subjected to PSYOPS disinformation from their government concerning the Russia-Georgia conflict over South Ossetia.
Soviet ruler Joseph Stalin incorporated South Ossetia, formerly a part of Russia, into his home province of Georgia. When the Soviet Union broke up, Georgia became independent and retained South Ossetia. Secession movements arose in South Ossetia and in Abkhazia. These secession movements were the reason European members of NATO rejected the US government’s attempt to make Georgia a NATO member in order to extend the US/NATO military presence on Russia’s borders in contravention of previous US government agreements with Russia.
To terminate the secession movement and, thereby, remove the barrier to Georgia becoming a NATO member, the US, with Israel’s help, trained and equipped the Georgian military and gave the American puppet ruler, installed in the aftermath of one of the US-orchestrated “color revolutions”, the green light to attack South Ossetia.
Under mutual agreement, Russia and Georgia both provided peace-keeping troops in South Ossetia to prevent violence by secessionists. On the night of August 7-8, 2008, Georgian troops attacked South Ossetia, destroying a town and killing many Russian Ossetians and some Russian soldiers who were part of the peace-keeping force. Large numbers of South Ossetians fled across the border to Russia.
The US government, in its hubris, assumed that Russia would accept the ethnic cleansing of Russians from South Ossetia. Instead, Russian troops arrived and quickly destroyed the American-trained and equipped Georgian army and could easily have taken control of Georgia, but refrained.
Defeated in its aim, the US government unleashed a PSYOPS disinformation war against the Russian government, claiming falsely that Russia had initiated the conflict by attacking Georgia. The US government’s blatant and transparent lies were force-fed to the American public by the US media.
British disinformation services cooperated with their American masters, but the rest of the world blew the whistle. The real facts emerged, and an American disinformation campaign experienced a rare failure.
Now ten months later, US "black ops" is at it again, pumping out disinformation about the "stolen" Iranian election. The US media is again serving the government’s disinformation campaign. This despite the fact that on May 23, 2007, Brian Ross and Richard Esposito reported on ABC News: "The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert "black" operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell...ABC News."
On May 27, 2007, the London Telegraph independently reported: "Mr. Bush has signed an official document endorsing CIA plans for a propaganda and disinformation campaign intended to destabilize, and eventually topple, the theocratic rule of the mullahs."
A few days previously, the Telegraph reported on May 16, 2007, that Bush administration neocon warmonger John Bolton told the Telegraph that a US military attack on Iran would "be a ‘last option’ after economic sanctions and attempts to foment a popular revolution had failed."
On June 29, 2008, Seymour Hersh reported in the New Yorker: "Late last year, Congress agreed to a request from President Bush to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence, and congressional sources. These operations, for which the President sought up to four hundred million dollars, were described in a Presidential Finding signed by Bush, and are designed to destabilize the country’s religious leadership."
The Iranian election protests, essentially by the westernized youth of Tehran who wish to be free of Islamic moral codes, have the hallmarks of orchestration. The protesters are color-coded with green wristbands. Their protest signs are in English and are obviously directed at the western media. Their chants are propagandistic and bear no relation to facts known by every Iranian.
And again, the US media and various experts, whose ambitions depend on government-related careers, are force-feeding the American public the disinformation designed to further isolate and weaken, if not overthrow, the Iranian government.
Until 1978 the US ruled Iran through the Shah. The US intends to again rule Iran through puppets. The only two remaining independent governments in the region are Iran and Syria. If the US doesn’t first bankrupt itself, both countries will fall to US black ops destabilization.
The limitless gullibility of the American people guarantees carte blanche to the US government’s schemes. Americans seemingly cannot put two and two together. They have already forgotten the lies about weapons of mass destruction that have resulted in the destruction of Iraq. They have forgotten Secretary of State Colin Powell’s publicly expressed remorse at the lies he told the UN. Americans blithely accept the conflation of Taliban with al Qaeda and terrorists and the new war that the Obama regime has started in Pakistan, a war that has already produced 2 million refugees.
It can fairly be said that there is not much difference between the American public and the fictional one under Big Brother in George Orwell’s 1984. The few independent voices that do exist are simply drowned out by the constant flow of disinformation.
The US government’s success in spinning 9/11 guaranteed the government’s success in pursuing a hegemonic agenda under a cloak of lies. Although a large percentage of the US population does not believe the government’s account and hundreds, perhaps thousands, of experts and informed and well-connected people have challenged the government’s tale, the US media has shown no interest despite the official account of 9/11 bearing every known hallmark of a coverup.
High-ranking fire marshals have complained that legally required forensic procedures were not followed by authorities entrusted with investigation.
The testimony of more than 100 policemen, firemen, and maintenance personnel who were in the towers at the time and report hearing and experiencing a series of explosions was ignored and withheld from the public until the government got its story in place.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology studiously avoided testing for evidence of explosives. The severed steel beams were quickly collected and sold abroad as scrap.
As a number of observers have complained, the crime scene was destroyed, not investigated.
The government’s story of the destruction of the towers is based on computer simulations that produce results in keeping with the assumptions.
The collapse of the third building is not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
No one abroad believes the US government’s story. Europeans have produced documentary films that laugh at the official explanation.
Recently, an international team of scientists reported on their two year examination of dust samples from the debris. They report that they found nano-thermite in the samples. To my knowledge no mainstream US media reported the finding.
One would think that such a finding would lead to a real investigation. Instead, within the US the finding is dismissed by debunkers of "conspiracy theories" (except of course the government’s own conspiracy theory) with the charge that the dust samples have not been in controlled environments since collected and could have been contaminated by those who volunteered the samples. In other words, the nano-thermite, if actually in the samples, was planted.
One wonders how residents of lower Manhattan obtained nano-thermite with which to contaminate the dust. Indeed, who has access to nano-thermite other than government?
Why doesn’t the National Academy of Science choose a team to examine the samples? If the finding of nano-thermite is verified, the issue of contamination can be investigated. If it turns out that the people who volunteered the samples have no possible access to nano-thermite, the case for a real investigation is established.
There is little prospect of such a development in the US. American science and the careers of scientists are heavily dependent on US government funding. It would be a career-ending event for American scientists to get involved with this matter other than as a contributor to a cover-up. Professor Steven Jones, a physicist at BYU who first raised the issue of explosives being used to bring down the three WTC buildings, was terminated, despite his tenure, by BYU. Many believe Jones was terminated because of political threats to the university’s funding.
In the US truth is an ineffective means by which to hold government accountable. Consider, for example, the fate of whistleblowers. Daniel Ellsberg who leaked the Pentagon Papers was perhaps the last successful whistleblower and that was three decades ago. Since then the government has put in place many defenses against whistleblowers.
The American public has looked to government for its salvation since Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal. Government provides education, health care (Medicare, Medicaid), pensions (Social Security), food stamps, housing subsidies, child care and protects Americans from a long list of demonized villains ranging from spouse abusers and child molesters to terrorists. Americans see themselves and their government as the salt of the earth, an image supported by American generosity to other peoples who suffer natural calamities. Most Americans believe that their government does stupid things, but not evil things except perhaps by accident.
The right-wing believes that America was attacked on 9/11 because we are so good, hubris to which Bush successfully played with his statement that "they hate us for our freedom and democracy."
The left-wing finds emotional satisfaction in its belief that 9/11 was deserved blow-back from peoples oppressed by US foreign policy who rose up and struck back.
Truth is so impotent in America that the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty 42 years ago is still covered up by the US government despite the best efforts of Admiral Tom Moorer, who was Chief of Naval Operations and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and by decades of effort by the Liberty survivors.
This raises the question: Why do some people blow whistles? Why do those few write books and columns that challenge the lies and deceptions? There is probably more than one answer. For some, hope springs eternal. Others naively destroy their careers thinking that truth will be honored. Still others speak from a sense of responsibility to truth and not from a hope that anything will actually change.
In October 1987 John Stockwell, a former CIA cover operative who ran the CIA’s covert war in Angola, gave a lecture in which he said he abandoned his career when he realized that CIA covert operations resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people and were totally unconnected to any US national security interests. "I concluded that I just couldn’t see the point."
Nothing has changed. What was the point of the US invasion of Iraq? Even President Bush eventually conceded that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
What was the point of the US invasion of Afghanistan and what is the point of Obama’s escalation of the war there? The Taliban is not al Qaeda and was totally focused on unifying Afghanistan under an Islamic government. The US was not on the Taliban’s radar screen.
What is the point of the war that the US has started in Pakistan?
What is the point of the destabilization of the Iranian government? After the stolen elections of the Karl Rove/Bush era, why does the US think it must overthrow the Iranian government because of allegations that Ahmadinejad stole an election?
If the answer is that these wars and interventions serve the interest of US hegemony, the obvious reply is that US hegemony is more likely to be lost from the massive red ink in the government’s budget that is likely to be monetized, thus destroying the dollar as reserve currency, the main source of US hegemony.
If the US wants to have an empire in the Middle East or elsewhere, the government should come out and say so. At least then Americans could revel in the glories of empire. As it is, the pleasure must be gained surreptitiously under the table, pretending that we are protecting the world from evil-doers while we do evil ourselves.
Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. He has held numerous academic appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded the Legion of Honor by French President Francois Mitterrand. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet Economy and Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice. Click here for Peter Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.
The Death Of Due Process Of Law In The United States
Also see:
Hegemony's Cost By Paul Craig Roberts
posted by James F. Marino at 8:25 AM
See: John St. Clair Akwei VS NSA 
NSA Remote Neural Monitoring Of The American People's Brains And The Concept Of Punishing People For Their Thoughts Has Become A Reality In The United States
<< Home