Voice Cloning & Video Holograms Can Give The Impression Of A Completely Cloned Person

While I am nearly certain that humans or human hybrids have been cloned by way of Extraterrestrial experimentation, I know for certain that it is possible to clone the human voice. I have also seen holograms of humans created from the use of gas plasma, which are so close to the real thing, that to the naked eye they are indistinguishable from us. Consequently, I must now wonder if the FEDS will find ways of exploiting this technology for their own criminal purposes.

A prime example of a criminal application of voice cloning were the voices of a few of the passengers on the alleged ill fated Flight 93, which was again alleged to have crashed in Pennsylvania. In this case, no technology existed at the time for a cell phone call to take place at 32,000 feet in the air, the altitude at which Flight 93 was alleged to have been flying when the calls were recorded.

It was the now famous documentary of film maker Dylan Avery known only as 911 Loosechange, which hypothesized that the calls from the ill fated flight could not have taken place as the FBI had told us, since there was no way for someone using a cellphone to communicate with a phone on the ground at that altitude. However, since 2001, equipment has been implemented on airliners to allow for cell phone calls at the 32,000 foot altitude -- but, this technology was not in use on airliners at the time of the 9-11 attacks, so the phone calls could not have taken place as we were told.

Dylan's conclusion was that the cell phone calls were faked by the US Intelligence community as part of the black operation that was 9-11. And many people -- worldwide -- now believe him. Avery also found documentation which showed Flight 93 landing at a Cleveland, Ohio airport not too long after it was reported to have crashed in PA.

What has become of United States Federal Government, when a 22 year old novice film maker can put together a documentary containing clear evidence of a government cover up, that a commission created to investigate the attacks on 9-11 clearly missed?

We would have to arrive at one of the following three conclusions here:

1. That Avery's deductive skills are postively brilliant

2. That the people chosen to investigate the attacks were complete morons

3. That Avery was finding some obvious information that was available on the Internet
which made good sense to all who saw it, and that the people chosen to investigate 9-11 were not morons at all, but rather, criminal conspirators in what would turn out to be the mother of all black operations.

One would have to surmize from the information gathered, that the most likely answer is three. However, Avery certainly did an excellent job of putting all of this information together in a fascinating documentary which is certain to become a part of American history, since it documents the biggest conspiracy by a government against its own people, ever recorded.

If you have not yet seen Avery's documentary you can access it at the following site. More than 2.5 million people have seen it since September 11th, 2006, the fifth anniversary of the 9-11 attacks. And more are seeing it every day as they learn about the treasonous acts that the Bush Adminstration and the Project For A New American Century perpetrated against the American people.

Dylan Avery's Documentary On The 9-11 Attacks:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501


My concern in regard to voice morphing technology is that given its sophistication, what is to prevent the FEDS from using it to frame innocent people whom they are looking to entrap in some Sting operation? Given the crimes that I know of in regard to the FBI and its COINTELPRO tactics, I would not put it past this organization to use this technology to do just that, especially in a court of law, when they have nothing else that they can use to prosecute someone they are targeting.

It would be very convenient for the FBI to clone someone's voice whom they are looking to target, and make it sound as though that person was involved in some type of illegal activity of the FBI's choosing, when in reality they were not.

Why would I say this?

Because when the FBI can't find legit reasons to arrest someone it resorts to the most despicable tactics imaginable, operating well outside the law, with its agents perjuring themselves in court in an effort to cover up what they have done. Voice cloning technology is just a little too tempting for this organization to pass up, especially when they have little or nothing to charge a target with.

Of course when the FBI has plenty of evidence to proceed with in an investigation, how they respond depends on who the person or persons are. In the case of the attacks on 9-11, and the missile downing of TWA Flight 800 in 1996, the FBI had an abundance of information with which to work. Why they chose to discard it raises the question of FBI complicity in a cover up.

When you have more than 200 eyewitnesses to a missile attack on a jetliner and you choose to ignore all of them, in favor of concocting your own explanation which is diametrically opposed to the evidence at hand, you raise serious questions about your own credibility. And the FBI has done just that, since it's been guilty of obstructing justice by helping to perpetrate disinformation to mislead the American people. This has had happened on numerous occasions, including the 9-11 attacks, where the FBI seized and refused to release three of the four black boxes of the aircraft that hit the World Trade Center Towers, as well as all of the video from the cameras surrounding the Pentagon and nearby businesses, which had tapes that captured the explosion after the alleged crash of Flight 77.

According to the FBI, the boxes were never found. However two workers at the site both claimed to have seen these boxes sitting in back of an all terrain vehicle, and were told by agents at the site never to mention having seen the boxes to anyone.

However, given the gravity of the attacks that took place, both Mike Bellone and Nick Dimassi refused to listen to the FBI and came forward with their information, realizing its importance to the public and that a conspiracy at the highest levels
of US Government was taking place.

Why would the FBI hold back such crucial evidence from the public more than 4 years after the investigation? Because the hierarchy within the FBI (including FBI director Robert Mueller) is guilty of aiding and abetting the Bush Adminstration in covering up the facts behind 9-11, and in creating an alternate explanation for the attacks, just like the FBI did in regard to TWA Flight 800, when it chose to ignore the evidence and concoct a multimillion dollar, 7 month waste of taxpayer money, in order to perpetrate a complete hoax on the American people.

(George W. Bush signed a secret document -- W-199 -- which threatened to have any intelligence agent who was working on terrorist ties to the Saudi Royal Family arrested as a threat to National Security.)

In both cases the FBI was guilty of obstructing justice by either aiding and abetting criminal activity, fabricating disinformation in order to legitimize the cover up, or perhaps even both.

So exactly why do we need the FBI?

See an article written on voice cloning technology at the following URL:

http://www.rense.com/general12/ld.htm