Why It's So Difficult To File A Lawsuit Against The Federal Government - Especially In The Days Of The Patriot Act Defacto Constitution...
Editor's Note: In a day and age where there are quite literally thousands of American citizens using the Internet in which to voice their complaints about being subjected to the types of non consensual human experimentation, discussed in the following lawsuit "Orlikow VS CIA," one may reasonably conclude that such lawsuits will in all likelihood, become commonplace in the future.
This is the direct result of the U.S. Judicial System being told to ignore such suits, thus creating a backlog in what is sure to become a specialized field of law in the future - electronic warfare harassment.
(Since these lawsuits involve the use of classified technologies which the U.S. Federal Government continues to deploy furtively against U.S. citizens, yet repeatedly denies the existence of.)
Thus far, attempts to bring such lawsuits against the U.S. Military-Intelligence complex, in regard to its clandestine use of this classified technology on the public, have been unsuccessful; even though a minimal number of lawsuits regarding the CIA's MKULTRA program have resulted in minimal financial compensation to the victims of these CIA crimes against humanity.
Moreover, the fact that one such lawsuit (which involves the government's use of classified technology on American citizens) is presently being shuffled from court to court in the State of NY and shows every sign of being ignored, is indicative of the U.S. Federal Government's denial regarding what has become the greatest criminal conspiracy against a citizenry in human history.
The use of classified mind control weaponry, which is being deployed against Americans citizens who have been unwittingly targeted for such Orwellian crimes, and as the direct result of a national brain fingerprinting program, implemented by the National Security Agency.
This program involves the subjugation of its victims to remote forms of torture via weaponized satellite networks like the NSA's Echelon, as well as sophisticated psychological warfare operations which involve everything from the vigilante hate crime of organized stalking, to psyops that are specifically tailored to each targeted individual.
Yet the mainstream media in America remains silent on this subject; once again, complicit in a treasonous conspiracy in which to destroy the U.S. Constitution.
The following passage has been excerpted from the lawsuit of Orlikow VS The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, and involves the Agency's secretive MKULTRA mind control operations, which officially took place from the 1950's to the early 1970's.
In the new millennium, such covert black operations are being conducted through the electromagnetic spectrum via specialized satellite networks such as Echelon, and which deploy the use of *wireless computer to brain interface technology, as well as directed energy weaponry, which also makes use of the EMF spectrum.
* See Akwei VS NSA regarding the NSA's Signals Intelligence EMF Scanning Network
Furthermore, if the American people ever manage to restore their Constitutional Republic as the direct result of abolishing the Federal Reserve System and Internal Revenue Service, through the repeal of the Federal Reserve Act and 16TH Amendment, the U.S. Courts will find themselves overwhelmed with lawsuits which involve the very types of non consensual human experimentation that is documented in the following lawsuit, as well as those of other Americans such as John St. Clair Akwei and a lawsuit which he has been attempting to have tried against the National Security Agency for the past two decades.
Such human rights lawsuits will serve as the foundation for the myriad others which are certain to be filed in the coming years, as the facade of a democracy in America fades away, and the victims of these crimes unmask the Zionist financed military-intelligence dictatorship which is being used to destroy this once great nation.
Foreword
"Our courts serve us best when the law advances the public interest. Occasionally this happens in suits brought solely to protect a private party's personal interest, but more often progress is made through a test case brought and designed to further both public and private goals. Our decade long fight to secure redress for the Canadian victims of CIA brainwashing experiments, Orlikow, et al. v. United States,1 is an example of such a public interest litigation.
But this case involving the CIA goes far beyond the typical public interest litigation precisely because it addresses an area of lawbreaking where normal political and legal remedies are not available. As the late Senator Frank Church concluded, after leading the congressional investigation of the CIA's improper activities in the 1950s and 1960s, that agency was "a rogue elephant" operating outside the law and protected by a shroud of secrecy. This is an account of that rogue elephant's reckless experimentation upon unwitting Canadian citizens, as well as the story of a public interest litigation against an opponent of immense power and dubious purpose.
The forty years since 1950 have been an unprecedented period of national security hysteria fueled by the likes of the Dulles brothers, Joseph McCarthy, J. Edgar Hoover and Richard Helms, and implemented through repressive measures enacted by the state and federal legislatures. In the course of this hysteria, individual liberties have too often been sacrificed in the name of national security. During this period, federal court decisions have occasionally restored liberties and protected traditional constitutional values, but these judicial successes have been few and far between.
The clash between liberty and national security has never been as stark as in the inhumane and illegal sponsorship of the Canadian brainwashing experiments by our most powerful national intelligence agency -- an institution that was created to protect and to preserve the very freedoms that were so devastated in those irresponsible experiments. After years of effort, vindication was won through the payment of nearly a million dollars to the CIA's victims by the governments of the United States and Canada in response to the federal suit.
This review of the CIA's actions in the United States and Canada demonstrates how completely unprincipled was the Agency's original brainwashing program, as well as its course of legal manoeuvers years later when it was required to answer for its misconduct. The story of the brainwashing suit and the barriers that were overcome before the CIA's victims were finally compensated, illustrates both the formidable hurdles presented and the unique satisfactions gleaned in a public interest law suit. "
__________
1 682 F. Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988) (Civ. No. 80-3163)
See Anatomy Of A Public Interest Case Against The CIA At The Following Website:
Orlikow VS CIA - Anatomy Of A Public Interest Case Against The CIA
posted by James F. Marino at 6:50 AM
See: John St. Clair Akwei VS NSA 
NSA Remote Neural Monitoring Of The American People's Brains And The Concept Of Punishing People For Their Thoughts Has Become A Reality In The United States
<< Home