FBI Faked Terror Alerts In Order To Illegally Obtain Phone Records - FBI Subpoena Scam Exposed
Editor's Note: The following article describes the FBI's continued attempts in which to destroy the Constitutional rule of law in the United States, through intimidation tactics and illegal searches obtained through "exigent letters."
The FBI's agents have become so arrogant and completely consumed with their unchecked powers, that they now believe themselves to be immune from prosecution, regardless of how outrageous and criminal their actions are. How much longer will the American people tolerate such a treasonous abuse of their inherent rights as citizens of this country before they force Congress to abolish this Gestapo?
On an aside, this author's regular readership, which now numbers in the millions, is aware that the FBI/NSA COINTELPRO of my person involves myriad forms of harassment, including electronic harassment. The electronic tamperings involve anything having to do with electrical components, such as radios, TV's, Internet connections, motion sensitive spotlights, home and car alarms etc. On a more invasive scale, these tamperings include electronic warfare attacks on the human body, especially the brain, which can result in devastating consequences.
My Internet connection is also regularly tampered with in some way, and oftentimes E-mail accounts and Websites (such as this blog) are also electronically interfered with. For example, the NSA regularly electronically interferes with this Blog. Today, NSA is electronically slowing the internal search feature of my Blogger account, so that it becomes impossible to do a quick search for articles which this author has written over the past few years. This necessitates going manually through the articles, which takes much longer.
This is just another example of how the Intel community abuses the inherent rights of Americans targeted for COINTELPRO operations, and how many of these agents consider themselves to be above the Constitutional rule of law. The end result is that through such criminal operations, the Intel community has destroyed their own credibility, and now defined themselves as a very dangerous group of interlopers who threaten the safety and privacy of American citizens by way of satellite predation.
The NSA's illicit brain fingerprinting of the American people is the best example of such outrageous abuses. However, given the devastating nature of this high crime of treason, the U.S. Courts are unwilling to hear the case of John St. Clair Akwei, who in 1991, filed a federal lawsuit against the NSA in regard to the Agency's egregious abuse of its Signals Intelligence operations.
For those who have not yet read the contents of John Akwei's historic and precedent setting lawsuit, you can do so at the following Website, since Akwei's information will eventually become generally understood by the American people, even if the U.S. Courts continue to refuse to allow Akwei to present his case in an American courtroom.
The gist of Akwei's lawsuit is that the NSA has secretly electronically brain fingerprinted the American people, and that having done so, any American citizen can be unwittingly pinpointed and tracked by the NSA, which uses the electromagnetic field around the human body as a form of GPS tracking device, in which to conduct such covert spying.
Akwei also refers to the NSA's Signals Intelligence EMF Scanning Network; a satellite based cellular network which utilizes the NSA's proprietary computer technology, in which to establish computer to brain interface with the brain of any American citizen, whom the NSA targets for such illicit violations of the 4TH Amendment. Akwei also states that this "EMF dial up network" is used to establish two way communication with the brain of a targeted subject, which means that the NSA can both intercept and decode a targeted person's thoughts, as well as implant thoughts into the minds of such subjects, without the subject's knowledge or consent. In other words, the NSA is using this electronic warfare technology in which to conduct non consensual human experimentation on American citizens.
However, such abject violations of the privacy of the American people will not be tolerated under any circumstances.
Subpeona Scamola Exposed
By Chris Williams
Posted in Government, 20th January 2010 11:23 GMT
The FBI fabricated terrorism emergencies to obtain thousands of phone records between 2002 and 2006, it's been revealed.
The Bureau created "exigent letters" to get around rules that had already been significantly loosened by the Patriot Act. The letters were used to obtain some 2,000 phone records, The Washington Post reports.
Washington Post and New York Times journalists were among the targets.
The internal concerns were confirmed in emails that are part of an investigation by the Justice Department's inspector general, which is due to report this month.
As well as fabricating emergencies, FBI counter-terror investigators obtained phone records by simply leaning on operators, getting approval after the fact with blanket authorisations.
The Patriot Act allowed investigators to effectively self-certify their requests for communications data, using a "National Security Letter" (NSL), a type of subpoena without judicial oversight. The Justice Department has found that by fabricating emergencies and sending NSLs after it had obtained phone records, the FBI violated what civil liberties protections remained.
In response, the FBI claimed that although it did not follow statutory process to obtain the records, they were all legitimate targets for investigation.
"The [Justice Department] report is not expected to find — nor were there — any intentional attempts to obtain records that counter terrorism personnel knew they were not legally entitled to obtain," said assistant director of public affairs Michael Kortan.
He added all the numbers obtained have been deleted and that "steps were taken as early as 2006 to ensure similar situations do not occur in the future". However, The Washington Post said it had seen emails showing FBI lawyers sounded the alarm in 2005.
The US NSL system is similar to the UK's Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) regime for authorities to obtain communications data from phone companies and ISPs. Each has no judicial oversight and investigators effectively self-certify their requests.
The UK system is much broader, however, with no requirement that national security is threatened and many more agencies, such as local councils, empowered to access records.
Oversight is provided by a former High Court judge appointed by the Prime Minister, who produces an annual report. In 2008, the most recent available, he says that 595 errors were made but added: "I am not convinced that any useful purpose would be served by providing a more detailed report of these errors."
The government is developing a major extension to communications surveillance that would require Internet firms to retain huge amounts of extra data, under the Interception Modernisation Programme. Ministers have argued that that RIPA will be sufficient to govern access to the newly available terabytes of private information.
®
This article was sourced from:
<< Home