Alternative Journalist Christopher Bollyn - Has He Been Intimidated Into Toning Down His Hard Hitting 9-11 Investigative Reporting?

Christopher Bollyn Under Attack For His 9-11 Reports
Is The John Birch Society Supporting The 9-11 Mega LIE?
Those who have heard of Christopher Bollyn may first remember him for the article he wrote in regard to a beating that he received at the hands of the Chicago police back in 2006. An assault which Bollyn associated with his public challenge of the U.S. Federal Government's whitewash of the facts regarding the attacks on 9-11-2001.

There was also a rumour being floated by another well known alternative journalist named Eric Hufschmid, in which Hufschmid alleged that in the Summer of 2007, Christopher Bollyn and his family had been kidnapped, and that when Bollyn reappeared, he had notably toned down his aggressive journalistic style.

Bollyn replied that Eric Hufschmid had blatantly lied on his Website, when he made the statement that Bollyn and his family had been kidnapped. However, Bollyn was aggressively voicing his beating at the hands of the Chicago cops back in 2006, when they invaded his home and according to Bollyn tortured him for nearly six hours. So it is possible that he could have been "neutralized" at a later date if the initial attack failed to prevent him from doing any further investigative research into 9-11.

What follows is an *article which Bollyn posted accusing the John Birch Society of acquiescing to the official 9-11 account/lie.

*Bollyn's letter to Hufshmid can be seen after this article.

The readers will note Bollyn's aggressive style in the JBS article. His articles prior to the accusations that he had been kidnapped were of equal tenacity.

Moreover, note the following quote by Christopher Bollyn, which he included at the end of an article in which he described his arrest and torture at the hands of the Chicago police back in 2006.

"I am shocked at how I was treated, because although my journalism gets me into trouble with police in many places, I have never been treated so brutally in my life. I honestly believe this brutal treatment is connected to my 9/11 research. I intend to seek asylum in Norway or Switzerland. I can read the writing on the wall. Investigative journalists are not safe in Iraq – or the United States."

Given this statement by Bollyn, Eric Hufschmid's allegations that Bollyn may have at some point been kidnapped and intimidated into silence for his aggressive exposition of the 9-11 fraud, may be plausible. However, only Christopher Bollyn knows for certain. And of course it's also possible that he was never was kidnapped at all.

However, there's no doubt that he was severely traumatized from the vicious attack that he received at the hands of the Chicago police back in 2006, and that those within the federal government who pulled off the attacks on 9-11, did not want credible sources like Bollyn going against the grain, by proving that the official 9-11 investigation was nothing but a lie.

Regardless of who's telling the truth here, one thing's for certain. Both Christopher Bollyn and Eric *Hufshmid have made very important contributions to the 9-11 Truth Movement, as well as their exposition of the Zionism angle in the attacks on 9-11. And this makes them targets of those whose intention is for the official government whitewash of the facts to be maintained at any and all costs.

*Hufshmid's interest in regard to WTC7 as the focal point for the attacks on 9-11 also has a lot of merit, given that it housed the offices of several alphabet agencies (including the SEC), and contained myriad files regarding federal investigations which were ongoing at the time that WTC7 was imploded, and these files were destroyed. Very convenient for those who were under investigation and further evidence of the breadth of this treasonous conspiracy.


Source: American Free Press

9/11 DISINFORMATION & THE JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY

THE 9/11 DISINFORMATION EFFORT & THE NEW AMERICAN

By Christopher Bollyn
American Free Press
The New American, mouthpiece for the John Birch Society, is trying to bolster the official version of the 9/11 attacks by ignoring crucial evidence and unfairly attacking independent researchers.

The government's refusal to release evidence, "even to congressional committees," has invited and "even incited" public suspicion about the events of 9/11, William F. Jasper, senior editor of The New American, wrote in the conservative magazine's May 2 cover story "9/11 Conspiracy Fact & Fiction."

Jasper laments the government's continuing "pattern of secrecy and cover-up," but rather than criticize the government for withholding evidence, Jasper attacks independent 9/11 researchers who make use of the available evidence.

"Our objective," Jasper wrote, "is to expose a few of the hoaxes."

The "hoaxes" The New American wants to expose appear to be any explanation that differs from the official version, put forth by the same government that refuses to release crucial evidence, such as the confiscated videos from the Pentagon attack.

"The official version of the Pentagon attack has been the main target of the critics," Jasper writes. Jasper tries to defend three points on which the official version has been criticized: the small hole in the building in relation to a 757, the lack of aircraft debris, and the difficulty of the flying maneuver.

Two noteworthy critics of the official version that Jasper names are Eric Hufschmid, author of the book Painful Questions, and Dave vonKleist, producer of the video In Plane Site.

Both vonKleist and Hufschmid have presented photographic evidence showing a turbine wheel from a jet engine “ much smaller than a 757's “ found at the Pentagon, an object American Free Press has investigated.

A new video on 9/11, Loose Change, by Dylan Avery (available through letsroll911.net) features AFP research on the unexplained engine part and shows two other parts found at the Pentagon, which it claims are not from a 757.

"If they could prove it, they would," Col. George Nelson (USAF, retired) told AFP about the government's failure to produce one piece of trackable aircraft debris from the 9/11 crash sites, "but they can't.

"It is impossible for all of the time change parts that have these serial numbers that are trackable…to be totally destroyed," Nelson, a 30-year career aircraft maintenance officer, said.

"I have never in my career ever seen a landing gear that was completely destroyed," Nelson said. "That landing gear is indestructible."

Loose Change also has an interview with the head of the flight school at the Maryland airport where Hani Hanjour, allegedly the pilot of the plane that struck the Pentagon, received low marks for his flying ability.

"Jasper is trying to distract the public,"; Hufschmid said. "It is important for the public to see the evidence. People around the world are questioning the official explanation of the September 11th attack. Anger towards the American government is increasing, but the public is not going to understand what is happening unless they look at the material that started this controversy."

Jasper did not contact either Hufschmid or vonKleist for the article. Instead he relies on comments provided by Brig. Gen. Benton K. Partin (USAF, retired) to try and prove that a Boeing 757 crashed into the ground floor of the Pentagon at 530 mph.

PAPartin, former director of the U.S. Air Force Armaments Technology Laboratory, says much of the aluminum-bodied aircraft vaporized on impact causing the white explosion at the Pentagon. The brief white flashes seen as the planes struck the twin towers were caused by the same phenomenon, Partin said.

When you slam an aluminum aircraft at high velocity into a concrete structure, it's going to do exactly what we saw happen at the Pentagon on 9/11, Partin said. If you look at the frontal mass cross-section of the plane, you see a cylinder of aluminum skin with stringers. When it impacts with the exterior wall at 700-800 feet per second, much of the kinetic energy of the plane converts to thermal energy, and much of the aluminum converts to vapor, burning to aluminum oxide.

That's why on the still photos from [the] Pentagon surveillance camera, you first see the frame with that brilliant white luminescent flash just before the frame of the orange fireball, the jet fuel burning. The aluminum cylinder “ the plane fuselage “ is acting like a shaped charge penetrating a steel plate. It keeps penetrating until it is consumed, Partin said. "The Boeing 757 is over 150 feet long, so it's going to penetrate quite a ways before it's spent. The wings have a much lower mass cross-section and are loaded with fuel besides, so there is little left of them except small bits and pieces.

"Like a cookie cutter through dough,"; Partin told AFP. According to Partin, the airplane's aluminum fuselage was traveling faster than a pistol bullet as it pierced the limestone clad exterior and bored through nine feet of reinforced concrete in the three outer rings of the Pentagon ending at the 12-foot hole in the inner wall of the "C" ring.

The same phenomenon caused the flashes seen at the twin towers in the vonKleist video, Partin said: "When the noses of the aircraft hit the buildings, you have a bright aluminum flash, the same as we saw at the Pentagon. That's obvious to anyone familiar with physics, chemistry, and what happens when aluminum hits a structure at a high rate of speed."

However, the white explosion seen at the Pentagon and the flashes seen as the planes struck the towers are very different. The white flash at the Pentagon is the initial blast of an explosion that turns orange, while the tower flashes are very brief and occur a fraction of a second before the planes impact each tower.

Critics, such as vonKleist, say the white flashes are evidence of missiles striking the buildings. In Plane Site focuses on a structural anomaly on the bottom of the aircraft striking the South Tower, which vonKleist says appears to be a missile pod.

A white object is seen being emitted from the bottom of the plane as it nears the tower. This object creates a white flash as it impacts the wall, slightly to the right of the aircraft fuselage. These missiles are thought to be depleted uranium penetrators used to ignite the conflagrations. This could explain the extensive decontamination done on the workers at the Pentagon site, according to Hufschmid.

About Partin's theory that parts of the aluminum aircraft vaporized on impact while the thin-skinned fuselage bored through nine feet of reinforced concrete, Paul F. Mlakar, technical director of the Pentagon Building Performance Report sponsored by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), told AFP, "I'm a little skeptical."
r>Mlakar, with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, thinks the 12-foot hole in the "C" ring was caused by an "avalanche of debris." That's where the black box was found, Mlakar said. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), who received the black box, told Mlakar the plane was traveling 460 knots, or 530 mph. The NTSB refuses to say anything about the black boxes saying it has turned over all data to the FBI.

757s don't go that fast. The airplane will just not do that, Russ Wittenberg, a retired pilot with United and Pan Am airlines, told AFP. "Its exceeding its air speed and mach speed limitations. The airplane just won't perform those maneuvers. The mach limit for a 757 is about 360 knots at 23,000 feet,"; Wittenberg said.

About the sharp descending turn made by the aircraft that hit the Pentagon at ground level, Wittenberg said: "The only air vehicle that could perform that would be a high-performance fighter jet, a remote controlled jet-powered drone, or a cruise missile."

The fuselage of a 757 did not open that 16-foot hole, Wittenberg said. The aluminum of the fuselage would have crumbled like an egg shell on impact. Aluminum doesn't vaporize."

There is no armor-piercing titanium on the tip of a 757, Wittenberg said. The white flash in the Pentagon video is the explosion of a high-energy explosive. The 12-foot hole is from the missile or the single jet engine aircraft that carried the missile. If a 757 had hit the Pentagon there would be two of these holes.

"Boeing's not going to say," spokesperson Liz Verdier responded when asked about the 757's mach limit, "What does it matter?" she said, "How fast it was going is immaterial."

Asked about Partin's theory that an aluminum-bodied aircraft both vaporized on impact and penetrated more than 9 feet of reinforced concrete, Marion Fulk, a retired chemical physicist and depleted uranium expert, told AFP: "I think what he's saying is nonsense. The titanium engines would be more likely to penetrate than the fuselage."

Finis


************

Reporter Christopher Bollyn Beaten by Chicago Cops

By Christopher Bollyn
American Free Press
<>>August 16th, 2006
Interview on RBN
Current Issues TV

It’s after 2 a.m. in the morning, my deadline is tomorrow, and I have been beaten up by the local police and my right elbow is sorely hurting, but I need to write down exactly what happened to me today before I go to sleep. Otherwise I will forget important details.

I was harassed, beaten, and shocked with a Tazer-like gun in my front yard before my wife and children, and then abused for 6 hours by the ADL-trained local police. I have every reason to believe it is because of my journalistic investigation into 9/11. I have been threatened before in my career as a journalist, but this is the first time I have been intentionally beaten and abused – by the cops.

I have investigated 9/11 since it happened and looked into the many unanswered questions of the terror attacks. I discovered last year that I had had at least two FBI informants crawling around my house for years. This is the main reason I do not feel safe in the United States. It is also why I spend much of the time in Europe or at safe houses in this country, with fellow 9/11 researchers like Ellen Mariani and Eric Hufschmid. I have two small children.

I have only been at my old home in Hoffman Estates for a couple of weeks, mainly because my road-weary children dearly love this old red house, which is the only home they have ever known. It is just a simple Hoffman-Rosner suburban Chicago tract home that my late parents bought in 1957, but it’s home.

I had noticed an unusual amount of police activity around my house since I returned. We live on a quiet side street where one might normally see a police cruiser once or twice a week. Since I returned I have noticed all kinds of police cars and devices in the immediate proximity of my house.

But yesterday there was something very unusual around my house. It was an unmarked car with three armed men with body armor driving around my block as I rode my bike to the store. Who in the heck is that? I thought to myself. It looks like they are going to my house, but I won’t be there, I thought.

Then today, the same time and the same car with three men passed slowly by my house where the neighborhood kids were playing. “Hello, FBI,” I said from my porch and waved.

The man in the front passenger seat waved back. I immediately alerted my wife and kids. Helje said I should stop them and ask them what they want.

For background, today I was working on two rather big stories and I made a lot of phone calls to the Embassy of Israel, the S.E.C., the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and to an old Israeli living in New York who I have suspicions may be a key player in 9/11. I’d like to discuss this lead but I can’t at this point.

All of my calls were about 9/11 related, except for the calls to the Embassy and local consulate of Israel. These were standard journalistic inquiries about Israel casualties and losses in Lebanon. The Embassy press department didn’t like my questions, but I told them it’s my job. I wanted to know about the number of dead and wounded and if 60 Merkava tanks had been taken out, as Hezbollah claims.

Then I also asked where exactly the two Israeli soldiers had been abducted. I told them that there were at least 15 newswire stories that said the soldiers had been captured in the Lebanese village of Aitaa al-Shaab – inside Lebanon. He was surprised to hear that, too.

Apart from my un-disclosable investigation, the other calls were about how Jacob “Kobi” Alexander was able to flee with more than $60 million dollars last week, several months after it was public knowledge that he and the other Israelis working with Comverse Technology, Ltd. had swindled hundred of millions through fraudulent stock options trades. This has been going on for years, and The Wall Street Journal and Globes (Israel) reported the names and the amounts last March. For crying out loud, my newspaper, American Free Press, reported it in April 2005.

I wanted to know from the SEC and the U.S. Attorney’s office how this Kobi Alexander was able to wire $60 million to his account in Israel and flee New York without any body stopping him. “If I wired $5 million to Norway the whole NSA and FBI would be all over me,” I said.

The U.S. Attorney’s office said they “expect” Kobi will turn himself in. Note to the wise: Don’t count on it.
r>Kobi Alexander was one of the owners and developers of Odigo software which allowed Israelis to communicate instantly on 9/11. It was via the “buddy system” on Odigo software, which allows one to communicate to a large group of people that share a trait, such as the Hebrew language, that thousands of Israelis were warned not to go to the twin towers on 9/11.
r>Kobi Alexander’s Mossad-linked company, Comverse Technology, was a developer and owner of Odigo since early 2000, something The New York Times does not consider to be part of “All the News that’s Fit to Print.” Comverse makes a black box system called the “Audio Disk” that police, intelligence and security agencies, and governments around the world, have attached to their phone networks. This simple device allows the Israeli employees of Comverse back in Tel Aviv to hear and intercept all the data being exchanged by these naive agencies…everything.

Hello…?

I had finished all of my calls and watched the first part of the Lou Dobb’s news program on CNN and was on my way to the store, when I stepped out on the stoop and saw this threatening dark car full of obvious agents of some sort. I immediately warned my wife and kids and rode the bike to the store.

Something is not right, I said to myself, and I stopped at the local wine shop and asked to use the phone. I called 911 and told them that a strange car with armed men is driving around my neighborhood for no apparent reason. I was told that a police car would meet me at my house in 20 minutes.

I was just in my house a few minutes when the very same suspicious car stopped in front of my house and three armor-clad men stood on my driveway. I had just been calling the police department and put down the phone. I was more than a little surprised to see these armor-clad thugs on my driveway.

My wife and 8-year old daughter were already there and I asked these men who they were and why they were harassing my street. Why are you driving around with this unmarked car around my house, I asked? Who are you, anyway? They were not at all willing to identify themselves and were very confrontational, to say the least.

I ran to my front door to call my brother when the three of them tackled me and shocked me with some sort of stun-gun. The three men then sat on me and pushed my face in the dirt, handcuffed me and put me in their car.

Remember, I had called 911 because of a suspicious car in my neighborhood, a neighborhood I have known since 1957, when my parents helped found this town.

I have two small children, after all, and this car looked very threatening to me. This is what I call my normal neighborhood obligations, but I discovered that they are actually watching us. They even joked about it at the station later. “We are watching you,” they said.

It should be noted that my neighborhood does not have any crime or gangs or anything of that nature that would warrant an undercover squad to patrol around my house day after day. This is why it is so suspicious. And why are they patrolling around my house?

As they pummeled me, my wife was pleading for me and my daughter was crying. I really wanted my brother, my neighbors, and my son to come help me but before even one minute had passed there were dozens of cops and firemen in my front yard.

Where did they all come from so quickly? How were so many police in my neighborhood at the same time? This is most unusual, as Hoffman Estates is spread out all over northwest Cook County, but there were at least 5 squad cars and at least 10 officers in my front yard within one minute of my being beaten up on my lawn.

Sitting in the squad car with handcuffs on is when the private abuse began. Officer Fitzgerald indulged in offending me, my late mother, a village pioneer, and then threatened to beat me.

When another officer came to the car, he told me that this guy was going to beat the —- out of me. When I repeated what he said word for word, he would say, “I didn’t say that.”

He then started to drive me to the station, which is about three miles away from the old village center where I live. Bombarded with continuous verbal abuse, when I would say something from the back-seat he would slam on the brakes so that my head hit the plexi-glass separation window. Typical Chicago cop torture treatment; rough the guy up on the way to the station. This is exactly the kind of thing that I ran against when I ran for mayor of this town in 2001.

I decided to lean back on the seat and not say another word.

When we got to the station, there was a host of white-gloved cops waiting for me in the police garage. When Officer Fitzgerald drove in to the garage, he told the 10-12 waiting cops: “He says cops are a bunch of ……….. You can take care of him now.”

When they took me out, I informed them that I am a journalist and will write about their treatment. The verbal abuse now came from all sides. They told me I should get out of town, etc. I told them that my dear parents had founded Hoffman Estates, but they didn’t care.

When I was in the station they forcibly stripped off my belt and tore of my shirt leaving me clad only in shorts and undershirt. I asked why I was being detained and they told me that I had resisted arrest and threatened the police with my fists, two complete lies.

I was never the subject of any arrest. I had called to police to report a suspicious vehicle driving around my home!

I was thrown into a cell with no water. I asked for a drink of water and was told, “Drink from the toilet.”

Why am I being treated this way, I wondered?

At midnight, an officer came to my cell and asked if I could pay $100 to get out. What I am being charged with, I asked? I called the police and they beat me up in my front yard, I protested.

What did I do to deserve that?

My older brother had posted bail and shortly after midnight, I was pushed out onto the street with a good two-mile walk home.

I am shocked at how I was treated, because although my journalism gets me into trouble with police in many places, I have never been treated so brutally in my life. I honestly believe this brutal treatment is connected to my 9/11 research.

I intend to seek asylum in Norway or Switzerland. I can read the writing on the wall.

Investigative journalists are not safe in Iraq – or the United States.

Source: American Free Press




* * * * * * *

In Response To: The Zionist Gatekeeper Greg Palast & His Attack on Dr. Jones and 9-11 Truth *PIC* (ChristopherBollyn)

Open Letter to Eric Hufschmid about Spreading False News and Baseless Accusations

Christopher Bollyn

Eric,

I have known you since 2002 when you were first writing Painful Questions, which I still consider to be the best book about 9-11. I helped you with the editing and since then you have helped me a great deal in my 9-11 research. I can safely say that you have been my biggest supporter since then.

You and I participated in Jimmy Walter’s 9-11 tour throughout Europe in May-June 2005. During the tour you saw how different Zionist agents desperately tried to prevent me from speaking about the evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11 and the key role that the Israeli-American Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff played in covering up the truth of what happened.

You remember how I was not allowed to speak in Vienna because of the efforts of Jenna Orkin to scare Jimmy and the local PR firm that my comments would be seen as illegal in Austria. You saw how that strange fellow in Paris and London begged me not to mention Chertoff in my speech.

You have also known that since November 2001 I have been targeted and unfairly smeared by Zionist agents, primarily the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith (ADL). When we visited you in May of 2006, I told you that we did not feel safe at our home in Illinois due to the intrusive FBI snoops.

Since then you have produced an excellent website, www.iamthewitness.com, with which you have done an excellent job in educating your readers and listeners about the history of Zionism and its control in the U.S. media and government.

As I told you then, if we want to win the hearts and minds of the public we have to have better websites to provide the essential information. On your website you have done an excellent job in posting some of my articles about 9-11 and Zionism, for which I am grateful.

When the police cranked up their intrusive snooping of me to the next level and invaded my home and brutally assaulted me, you used your website to bring attention to my plight in the corrupt courts of Cook County. I am very grateful for that.

I sincerely applaud your efforts to educate the public about Zionism and wish you continued success. The struggle against the crimes of Zionism is an extremely important battle which deserves our best efforts, which is why I am writing this open letter.

In order to win the struggle against the Zionist criminal network, we need to keep to the moral high ground and let the evidence and truth reveal the criminals. This is also my philosophy about exposing the truth about 9-11. The facts will reveal the criminals behind the crime.

If your website is to succeed in reaching a larger audience you have to stick to the truth and maintain the highest moral standards. It is essential for your success that you are fair and honest.

There are several areas where you have not stuck to the moral high ground and it has hurt your credibility immensely:

1. You have spread false news. 2. You have damaged my business and reputation by spreading false news.

3. You engage in baseless allegations against serious 9-11 researchers, like Dr. Steven E. Jones, and others.

4. You use violent and hateful language.

SPREADING FALSE NEWS

“Christopher Bollyn is still MIA, but don’t let that frighten you!”

For nearly two months, you and your colleague on The French Connection have said that I am M.I.A. and that I, and my family, have been kidnapped or killed. You, however, know very well that this is not true because we have been exchanging emails and spoken on the phone several times during this time.

This is spreading false news.

You know very well that I have not been kidnapped and I have told you so in plain English on several occasions since June that this is complete nonsense. So why do you continue to post such rubbish?

To this day the opening lines on your website say this:

Daryl Bradford Smith firmly believes that Linda Shelton is a principal in the bizarre disappearance of the Bollyn family, and calls for a full investigation into the actions and associations of this woman.

I understand that you work together with Mr. Smith but that you have never even met him. You know that I have not been kidnapped but you are unable to convince your associate on The French Connection of this?

What kind of partnership do you have with Mr. Smith? Does he not believe you, the webmaster and producer of his radio show?

Why do you allow him to spread false news which you know full well is absolutely false? Don’t you realize that this is like crying “wolf” and will only hurt your credibility?

Why have you spread alarm among my supporters with false news?

HURTING MY BUSINESS

You certainly realize that it was your criticism of American Free Press that allowed that organization to fire me in October 2006. Although I was not even aware of the article that you had written, AFP used it against me by saying that I was an “associate” of yours. So it was guilt by association which cost me my job.

Because you wrote a critical article about AFP on your website, I lost my job.

Since I lost my income from AFP, I have had to rely on donations, editing jobs, and selling my book for children, ABC Zoo. At the same time I have had to defend myself against malicious prosecution in the Cook County courts.

For the past two months or so, you have spread false information on my links which go through your website saying: “Note: we are not sure what happens if you donate money or order books from Bollyn!”

This “note” has obviously discouraged people from donating to my work or buying my book. Why would you do such a thing unless you really wanted to hurt my income and business?

BASELESS ACCUSATIONS

In your “Battle Plan” of 17 August 2007 you make some very unfair accusations and exhibit a very bizarre prejudice:

Under the subtitle “Professors, engineers, architects, and other phony ‘truth seekers’” you (or Mr. Smith) wrote:

“Some of these people may simply be naive, but they should all be considered guilty until proven innocent. Professor Steven Jones, for example, has been associating with Jim Hoffman for years.”

“Guilty until proven innocent?”

Guilty of what, may I ask?

Professor Jones has done more to explain the presence of molten metal in the rubble of the World Trade Center than anyone. His research has been extremely important in understanding what caused the buildings to collapse. For this he has suffered the slings and arrows of Zionist agents who grossly defamed him and caused him to lose his teaching position.

See: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=93189

Your baseless accusations against Jones put you on the same side as those Zionist agents who defamed the good professor in September 2006, namely Doug Fabrizio, Robert Goldberg, Gary Fine, and William Tumpowsky of the United Jewish Federation.

Whatever your motivation might be, you have done the same thing to Professor Jones as these Zionist agents. Why would you and Mr. Smith want to do that? Don’t you see that you are effectively carrying water for the Zionists and those who would hide the truth of 9-11 by making such baseless accusations against Dr. Jones?

How does it advance the cause of 9-11 truth to say that Professor Jones is “guilty until proven innocent?”

This is what I am in the Zionist-dominated court of Cook County. This is what I am in the eyes of Zionist-run CNN.

This is why I am now an exile.

I am considered guilty until proven innocent and despite an abundance of evidence that I am innocent - I was found “guilty.”

Don’t you know what it means to consider somebody guilty until proven innocent? It is absolutely outrageous to think or say such things.

Who do you think will accept such mean-spirited and un-American logic? How can you complain about being marginalized when you say such things on your website? Don’t you see that you and Mr. Smith are your own worst enemies?

Do you realize that “guilty until proven innocent” is exactly how President George W. Bush treated Saddam Hussein in relation to weapons of mass destruction? You are asking Jones to prove a negative - that he is not guilty?

You are saying that Jones is guilty because he “associates” with Jim Hoffman? Guilty of what?

Daryl B. Smith, your associate on The French Connection, evidently said some very nasty and untrue things about me after he met me in November 2005, yet I have never held you accountable for your association with the person who evidently slandered me.

This evil and malicious slander could have only come from him because it concerned my visit to his home in France during which he and his wife were the only people present besides me and my family. Ask yourself why Mr. Smith, or is it Dr. Smith, would spread evil slander about me and then avoid me for nearly a year.

I asked you if you have ever met Mr. Smith and you said he is “just a voice on the phone.” You do all this work for “a voice on the phone?”

Eric, do you really know who you are associating with? Does Mr. Smith really have your best interest at heart? Is he really after the truth of 9-11? If so, why would he say such evil and false things about me and my family?

After he slandered me, I spoke with you and Mr. Smith on your radio show. I did not hold this evil and harmful slander against you or your him. I thought it was more important to get the information about 9-11 out than to discuss our differences.

Now, however, I see that there is a pattern to this madness that is dangerous and harmful. I can no longer ignore the warning flags.

VIOLENT AND HATEFUL LANGUAGE

The last point concerns language used in the “Battle Plan” you and Mr. Smith have on your website. You use language that suggests or implies that violence needs to be used to regain control of our money supply, government, and media.

You, or Mr. Smith, wrote:

“Alex Jones and other Zionist Deniers often imply that the only way to stop “them” is with violence. We should consider the possibility that he is telling us the truth. The Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Chertoffs, and everybody else in this Zionist crime network may never give up. We may have to kill all of them.” “If violence erupts, the FBI and police may have to be our first targets.”

See: http://www.iamthewitness.com/Battle-Plan.html


As I wrote in my Statement on the Importance of Non-Violence:

This language could easily be seen as “hate speech” or inciting violence. With comments like these Hufschmid and Smith are going out on very thin ice - legally. This is nowhere I would want to go. I would strongly urge them to remove such comments and stick to the moral high ground. Such violent language marginalizes them - and their message. Don’t they see that? Hufschmid urges me to speak on his Internet radio show but I simply cannot and would not want be seen as supporting such calls for violence. I can not associate myself with people who are seen as supporting violence. It is that simple.

See: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=108125


I am compelled to write this open letter because my private communications with you obviously failed to produce any changes concerning the false news about me. You and Mr. Smith have lied about me and hurt my business. Your irresponsible and reckless comments can hurt you more than you think.

I urgently and strongly urge you to consider my comments and stick to the facts and the moral high ground. You must remove any comments that can be see as inciting violence. You must not make baseless allegations against others and you must stick to the truth. There is no other way.

Sincerely,
Christopher Bollyn
http://www.bollyn.com/