Terrorist George W. Bush Openly Endorses The Terrorist Act Of Vigilantism As An Experiment!

After reading the following article, those TI's who are being stalked by communal groups of criminal vigilantes will now understand why they receive no help from their politicans or law enforcement. George W. Bush who has amongst other things the distinction of being the president with the lowest IQ 92 (how the hell did he ever get into Yale? Oh that's right -- his criminal daddy) in US History, as well as the worst president in US History, has told these officials that they are now on an indefinite hiatus from their responsiblity to enforce the US Constitution.

This should come as no surprise since Bush himself has made it a policy of violating the US Constitution since stealing both the 2000 and 2004 elections. With his latest "what the heck" decision (he probably gave it all of 30 seconds of consideration -- which is about the length of his attention span), Bush has conclusively proven that he is A. an abject criminal, and B. completely and utterly insane.

Put these two concepts together and you are left with a president who is criminally insane. Add to this an Intelligence community whose fundamental belief system Is that of Nazism, and we have the makings of an Americanized version of the Holocaust heading our way, with the FBI running shotgun, as the Gestapo did back in the 1930's.

And what's worse is that Congress has allowed Bush to get away with this, which should tell you something about their collective state of mind. Like I said the other day, if you don't own a gun, you should seriously consider purchasing one, as it will be the only means by which you can enforce your Constitutional rights in the future. And the only thing which will stand between you and the complete lawlessness which we are now witnessing within our respective communities.


Also consider the following:

If something as radical as authorizing communities to become vigilante squads of stalking mercenaries can be perpetrated by the so called leader of this country, what's next?

Bringing back mob lynchings?


I cite the following quote:

"Groups of dedicated citizens who band together for a common cause—be it rounding up car thieves or castigating suspicious loiterers—strengthen and reinforce the social order," Bush said at a White House press conference. "I've never supported government intrusion in people's lives; I've always put more faith in the private sector. So I say, what the heck! Let's give vigilantism a go and see how things shake out. Why not?"

Groups of dedicated citizens or groups of cowardly criminals who enjoy the fact that they can take their frustrations out on others who've never done a thing to them, without the fear of being arrested for doing so? Consider this. Is there anywhere in the US Constitution where it states that an authorized government official can shirk their official responsiblities and in doing so violate the rights of their constituents? No, there is not. Furthermore, is there anywhere in the US Constitution where it states that the President may endorse the use of criminal behavior? Absolutely not.

So why are George W. Bush and the US Congress getting away with doing so? With this mindset, if Bush was an educator (perish the thought), his students would never have come back from recess.

As for Bush's comment in regard to the private sector, both he and his father should have stayed there -- they were just as dangerous, but didn't have nearly the opportunity of doing the damage that they have both collectively done to this country and its people, while in public office. Not to mention those of others countries, several of whom are still attempting to shake off the Bush Curse decades later.

From the ONION
Bush Lifts Ban On Vigilantism
'Let's See What Happens,' Says President
June 8, 2005 Issue 41•23

WASHINGTON, DC—In a striking departure from centuries of American belief in rule of law, President Bush gave his approval Monday to a limited experiment in public vigilantism "to see if it works."

Bush makes a call for more vigilante justice.

"Groups of dedicated citizens who band together for a common cause—be it rounding up car thieves or castigating suspicious loiterers—strengthen and reinforce the social order," Bush said at a White House press conference. "I've never supported government intrusion in people's lives; I've always put more faith in the private sector. So I say, what the heck! Let's give vigilantism a go and see how things shake out. Why not?"

Bush's self-described "plan to have no plan" permits elected and appointed government authorities to "look the other way" while bands of U.S. citizens enforce both the community standards that the existing legal code overlooks and those laws that police fail to enforce.

"From bordello-busters to subway shooters, vigilantes have a long history of pinpointing and resolving the problems plaguing their communities," Bush said. "Let's give 'em a shot."

Bush's remarks came in the wake of criticism among his ultraconservative supporters, who argue that "activist judges" often make decisions that contradict the will of the people. To help remedy this problem, many special-interest groups had been calling for an official tolerance of "vigilante judicial committees."

"Vigilantes have an undeserved reputation for recklessness," Republican pollster Jennifer Mendenhall said. "As we phase vigilantism in, be prepared to hear a lot of talk about 'mob-ocracies' and 'tyrannies of the bat-wielding, roving majorities.' That rhetoric is meant to scare peaceful citizens into thinking they need magisterial authority to protect their interests. But vigilantism is not about crazed drunkards clustering in town squares, waving pitchforks and crying out for blood. It's about an opportunity to let the citizens of America serve as their neighbors' meter maids, correctional officers, chiefs of police, or, if necessary, SWAT teams."

A vigilante group patrols a Colorado Springs, CO highway for litterers. Bush's decision has already mobilized vigilantes across the country.

"Who needed the police and the courts when I already knew who vandalized the restrooms at McDonnell Park?" Roy Kunz of Katy, TX said. "Bush has it right. It's high time we threw a few necktie parties around here."

Murphysboro, IL's Jo Crockett formed a vigilante committee to forcibly evict neighbor and "dirty, no-good slut" Haley Uhrig and her family from her neighborhood.

"Does the government care that [Uhrig] litters her yard with stinky diapers, blares her music around the clock, and steals our men? Hell no," Crockett said. "We couldn't wait around for an arrest warrant or a Jerry Springer segment producer to come to our aid. It's simple: That woman had to go."

Bush's endorsement of vigilante activity caught Capitol Hill Democrats off guard.

"I'm not sure vigilantism is in the best interest of the nation," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said. "Vigilantes are bad, aren't they? I read The Ox-Bow Incident in high school. They ended up hanging the wrong guys in that book, I think. That sort of situation could lead to a major problem for the government."

Bush stressed that his move was experimental, characterizing vigilantism as "practical."

"Frankly, government officials have all they can handle right now, overseeing foreign wars and doling out unemployment benefits," Bush said. "The truth is, we'd really appreciate some help maintaining domestic order while we take care of the important stuff."

"Let's see what happens, America," Bush added. "After all, our government is supposed to be of, by, and for the people. That's from the Constitution."